2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of submarine groundwater discharge estimates from a sandy unconfined aquifer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
147
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
8
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we observed Ra values at salinities of 1 and 25 that had the same activity-an unexpected result given what we know about Ra cycling in surface estuaries. In addition, at salinities <1, we observed measurable radium, hence even "fresh" groundwater may be a source of radium to surface waters, especially when fresh groundwater represents a significant portion of total SGD (as in Mulligan and Charette, 2006 considerably, even when bulk Ra shows little change. We recommend a simple approach for determining this quantity using 222 Rn equilibration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, we observed Ra values at salinities of 1 and 25 that had the same activity-an unexpected result given what we know about Ra cycling in surface estuaries. In addition, at salinities <1, we observed measurable radium, hence even "fresh" groundwater may be a source of radium to surface waters, especially when fresh groundwater represents a significant portion of total SGD (as in Mulligan and Charette, 2006 considerably, even when bulk Ra shows little change. We recommend a simple approach for determining this quantity using 222 Rn equilibration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Radium isotopes have been employed to determine the magnitude of SGD (0.035 m 3 s -1 , Mulligan and Charette, 2006) and several studies report considerable variability in groundwater radium activities (Charette et al, 2001;Abraham et al, 2003;Gonneea et al, 2006;Mulligan and Charette, 2006). Samples for this study were collected in June 2006, when aquifer levels were dropping and the fresh/saline groundwater interface was moving landward, inundating sediments that had been exposed to freshwater during the winter recharge period of the aquifer with higher salinity groundwater.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infrared imaging has been used to identify the location and spatial variability of SGD by exploiting the temperature difference between surface water and groundwater at certain times of the year (Portnoy et al, 1998;Miller and Ullman, 2004;Mulligan and Charette, 2006). While this technique is quite useful for identifying spatial discharge patterns, it has not yet been applied to estimating flow rates.…”
Section: Infrared Thermographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locations of SGD can be seen in the infrared image as locations along the beach face with cooler temperature than the surrounding surface water. The image clearly shows spatial variability in SGD along the beach face, information that is extremely valuable in designing an appropriate field sampling campaign (e.g., Mulligan and Charette, 2006). …”
Section: Infrared Thermographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation