1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1385-1101(96)90765-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of in situ suspended matter (floc) size measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values represented an increase of 5 to 27% with respect to the estimates established for the first crossing of the plume. Using estimate of E calculated for the ambient conditions recorded for each monitoring (8×10 -6 m 2 s -1 at CS30, 6×10 -6 m 2 s -1 at SC90), these values of E led to estimate of W s of 5×10 -5 m s -1 and 3×10 -5 m s -1 for the CS30 and SC90 sites respectively, which corresponds to typical settling velocities for fine sediment flocs (Eisma et al, 1996).…”
Section: Redeposition Of Turbid Plumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values represented an increase of 5 to 27% with respect to the estimates established for the first crossing of the plume. Using estimate of E calculated for the ambient conditions recorded for each monitoring (8×10 -6 m 2 s -1 at CS30, 6×10 -6 m 2 s -1 at SC90), these values of E led to estimate of W s of 5×10 -5 m s -1 and 3×10 -5 m s -1 for the CS30 and SC90 sites respectively, which corresponds to typical settling velocities for fine sediment flocs (Eisma et al, 1996).…”
Section: Redeposition Of Turbid Plumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sets of observations suggest that under energetic conditions, turbulence can limit floc size in bottom boundary layers [Kranck and Milligan, 1992;Luettich et al, 1993;Eisma et al, 1996;Berhane et al, 1997], yet these studies lack the type of measurements required to evaluate the predictive ability of various proposed relationships between maximal floc size and turbulence. Specifically, previous studies have not measured waves and currents well enough to produce accurate estimates of the boundary shear stress, which is linked to e in bottom boundary layers [Heathershaw, 1979;Luettich et al, 1993] goal of this work is to use these data to conduct a rigorous assessment of the in situ effect of turbulence on floc size.…”
Section: Paper Number 2000jc900102mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To distinguish between these two populations of particles, they introduced the terms ultimate (dispersed) and effective (flocculated) grain sizes. Since no systematic relationship exists between the ultimate and effective grain sizes (Eisma et al, 1996), ultimate grain sizes cannot be used in modelling (Droppo et al, 1998;Nicholas and Walling, 1996;Burt, 1995, 1997) and effective grain sizes have to be measured in situ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%