2009
DOI: 10.2151/sola.2009-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of Dvorak Parameters in the Tropical Cyclone Datasets over the Western North Pacific

Abstract: A study to compare Dvorak parameters (T-number and CI-number) for tropical cyclones over the western North Pacific in both JMA and JTWC datasets from 1987 to 2006 is presented to show if there is a difference between two datasets. The study shows that the Dvorak parameters by JTWC are generally higher than these by JMA during the period of 1992 1997 and 2002 2005. The major reasons for stronger cases in JTWC are "faster intensification before the mature stage and slow /delayed start of weakening after the matu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a second step, we derive wind speed from CI numbers by applying the original Dvorak conversion table (Dvorak 1984) used in JTWC (hereafter DT conversion). It is possible that the Koba conversion table was applied only to intensity records starting in 1991 and previous years were not updated to the new procedures (Nakazawa and Hoshino 2009). However, the remapping method using the Koba conversion table was applied for the complete analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a second step, we derive wind speed from CI numbers by applying the original Dvorak conversion table (Dvorak 1984) used in JTWC (hereafter DT conversion). It is possible that the Koba conversion table was applied only to intensity records starting in 1991 and previous years were not updated to the new procedures (Nakazawa and Hoshino 2009). However, the remapping method using the Koba conversion table was applied for the complete analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early 2000s CI discrepancies are still higher, especially for categories 4-5. Two periods of the strongest CI discrepancies were also identified by Nakazawa and Hoshino (2009) The reasons for changes in time of CI discrepancies can be related to separately evolving practices and usage of different information sources by operational centers. JMA reports geostationary satellites to be the principal source of TC localization and intensity estimation.…”
Section: Can the Reasons For Discrepancies Between Btdmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequent studies have also pointed out related problems such as a different wind-pressure relationship in different periods (Emanuel 2007;Knaff & Zehr 2007) or performed sub-sampling to estimate the actual frequency of intense TCs (Chang & Guo 2007;. Kamahori et al (2006), Wu et al (2006) and Nakazawa & Hoshino (2009) have also pointed out the differences in intensity estimates in the western North Pacific (WNP) among different warning centres after the termination of aircraft reconnaissance. It is decided that the 'official' best-track datasets will be used for the present study instead of 'modifying' the best-track datasets based on the results from these subsequent studies for the following reasons.…”
Section: Data and Methodology (A) Datamentioning
confidence: 99%