2022
DOI: 10.1080/15230430.2022.2059957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparing atmospheric reanalysis products for hydrodynamic and wave modeling of extreme events during the open-water Arctic season

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study utilizing this model (without sea ice parameterizations) with identical mesh, validated the model and showed it to possess reasonable accuracy in simulating storm water levels and waves during the summer season 62 . Additionally, validation of waves was performed in reference to the ESA Remote Sensing Significant Wave Height L3 product 67 over the period December 25th, 2016 to January 5th 2017.…”
Section: Storm Simulationmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous study utilizing this model (without sea ice parameterizations) with identical mesh, validated the model and showed it to possess reasonable accuracy in simulating storm water levels and waves during the summer season 62 . Additionally, validation of waves was performed in reference to the ESA Remote Sensing Significant Wave Height L3 product 67 over the period December 25th, 2016 to January 5th 2017.…”
Section: Storm Simulationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The ADCIRC + SWAN (ADvanced CIRCulation + Simulating WAves Nearshore) coupled model is used for numerical simulations of astronomical tides, storm surge 58,59 , and waves 60 as a function of forcing fields: wind, pressure, and sea ice concentration. Individually, both models have been used within the Alaska region to simulate water levels 61,62 and waves 35,63,64 . Through recent model developments, existing sea ice parameterizations for both storm surge 61 and wave dissipation 8 have been implemented into the coupled model.…”
Section: Storm Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%