2006
DOI: 10.1650/0010-5422(2006)108[366:iaadit]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercolony and Annual Differences in the Diet and Feeding Ecology of Little Tern Adults and Chicks in Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher feeding activity and success in 2003 than 2004 and 2005 accords with higher colony size and reproductive success reported for that year by Medeiros et al . (2007), which in turn may be related to a higher consumption of pelagic prey in 2003 (Catry et al . 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Higher feeding activity and success in 2003 than 2004 and 2005 accords with higher colony size and reproductive success reported for that year by Medeiros et al . (2007), which in turn may be related to a higher consumption of pelagic prey in 2003 (Catry et al . 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diet of many tern species (Fraser 1997, Ramos et al . 1998, McGinnis & Emslie 2001, Nisbet 2002), including Little Terns (Fasola & Bogliani 1990, Taylor & Roe 2004, Catry et al . 2006, Paiva et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prey commonly found in all three studies included larval blenny, mullet, anchovy and needlefish. The diet of the Damara tern chicks under study was similar to that described by Catry et al (2006) for fish fed to little tern chicks (e.g. Artherina sp., Mugil sp., Blennidae, Gobidae), by Elliot et al (2007) for the diet of the California least tern Sterna antillarum browni (e.g.…”
Section: Chick Diet and Energy Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to high levels of damage to invertebrate prey specimens from the ingestive and digestive processes and the paucity of some samples, we made no effort to quantify the exact number or mass of terrestrial invertebrates found within a particular laughing gull stomach as these numbers would be subject to large errors (Duffy and Jackson, 1986;Rosenberg and Cooper, 1990;Granadeiro et al, 2002). Data analyses.-We calculated frequency of occurrence (%) as the number of gulls that had consumed a given terrestrial insect taxon (e.g., family), expressed as a percentage of the total number of all laughing gulls (n 5 1053) collected and examined (Duffy and Jackson, 1986;Catry et al, 2006). We calculated the percent taxon occurrences of a given terrestrial insect taxon (e.g., order) as the number of individual occurrences of that taxon, expressed as a percentage of the total number of all taxon occurrences (Duffy and Jackson, 1986;Granadeiro et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methods Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%