2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13073-019-0633-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interchromosomal template-switching as a novel molecular mechanism for imprinting perturbations associated with Temple syndrome

Abstract: Background Intrachromosomal triplications (TRP) can contribute to disease etiology via gene dosage effects, gene disruption, position effects, or fusion gene formation. Recently, post-zygotic de novo triplications adjacent to copy-number neutral genomic intervals with runs of homozygosity (ROH) have been shown to result in uniparental isodisomy (UPD). The genomic structure of these complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs) shows a consistent pattern of an inverted triplication flanked by duplications … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include utilizing genome sequencing to identify pathogenic SVs missed by exome, such as the homozygous inversion in QDPR detected in a patient with dihydropteridine reductase deficiency; 52 applying RNA sequencing to identify genes with aberrant expression and or splicing, including an intronic variant in trans with a missense in muscle disease gene DES that resulted in a pseudo-exon insertion and allelic imbalance; 53 using bisulfite sequencing to identify gene silencing epivariation, such as the characterization of aberrant hypermethylation associated with a pathogenic repeat expansion in the XYLT1 promoter region; 54 and the application of long-read sequencing to characterize a complex genomic rearrangement involving an inverted triplication flanked by duplications in a proband with Temple syndrome. 55 The challenges with interpreting rare variation in the genome is a major barrier for achieving genetic diagnoses. To this end, CMGs investigators have built resources and tools to improve variant interpretation.…”
Section: Development Of Tools and Improved Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include utilizing genome sequencing to identify pathogenic SVs missed by exome, such as the homozygous inversion in QDPR detected in a patient with dihydropteridine reductase deficiency; 52 applying RNA sequencing to identify genes with aberrant expression and or splicing, including an intronic variant in trans with a missense in muscle disease gene DES that resulted in a pseudo-exon insertion and allelic imbalance; 53 using bisulfite sequencing to identify gene silencing epivariation, such as the characterization of aberrant hypermethylation associated with a pathogenic repeat expansion in the XYLT1 promoter region; 54 and the application of long-read sequencing to characterize a complex genomic rearrangement involving an inverted triplication flanked by duplications in a proband with Temple syndrome. 55 The challenges with interpreting rare variation in the genome is a major barrier for achieving genetic diagnoses. To this end, CMGs investigators have built resources and tools to improve variant interpretation.…”
Section: Development Of Tools and Improved Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lesions lead to overexpression of the paternally expressed genes and expression loss of DLK1 [58]. Recently, intrachromosomal triplications with runs of homozygosity (rare, postzygotic events, with undetectable mosaicism rate) have been reported as a potential mechanism causing segmental uniparental disomy in TS [59]. Mosaicisms occur in about 50% of cases.…”
Section: Temple Syndrome and Kagami-ogata Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cytogenetic world, inversions are classically defined as a balanced chromosomal rearrangements, that is, no gain or loss of genomic material is assumed to accompany their generation (Figure 1, left). However, smaller inversions, both unique and nonunique, forming together with kb or Mb size genomic amplifications and deletions can constitute 20%-30% of SVs in certain disease loci, challenging the copy-number neutral inversion model (Beck et al, 2015;Brand et al, 2015;Carvalho et al, 2019Carvalho et al, , 2013Carvalho et al, , 2015Carvalho et al, , 2011Figure 1, right). Supporting the observation in disease cohorts, population studies using NGS revealed that truly balanced inversions constitute a smaller fraction of the total inversions detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%