1980
DOI: 10.1126/science.7188649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interchangeability of Stress and Amphetamine in Sensitization

Abstract: In view of similarities between the behavioral, biochemical, and electrophysiological effects of amphetamine and stress, we tested the hypothesis that presentation of a stressor, mild tail pressure, can sensitize an animal to the later effects of amphetamine, and vice versa. Our findings supported this hypothesis and suggest that amphetamine and at least some stressors may be interchangeable in their ability to induce a sensitization. The data raise the possibility that stress might be a common variable contri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
211
0
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 534 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
14
211
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These tendencies are also likely to be associated with SSRI-induced attenuation of the expression of behavioral sensitization, because the repeated SAL treatment as repeated injection stress could augment the ability of amphetamines to induce abnormal behavior. This view seems to be supported by the previous observation (Antelman et al, 1980) indicating that repeated mild stress (tail pressure stress) resulted in an enhanced behavioral response to d-amphetamine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These tendencies are also likely to be associated with SSRI-induced attenuation of the expression of behavioral sensitization, because the repeated SAL treatment as repeated injection stress could augment the ability of amphetamines to induce abnormal behavior. This view seems to be supported by the previous observation (Antelman et al, 1980) indicating that repeated mild stress (tail pressure stress) resulted in an enhanced behavioral response to d-amphetamine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…First, the available data show that the group differences in vulnerability and susceptibility to the behavioural effects of dexamphet amine become especially evident when the rats are exposed to intermediate doses of dexamphetamine (0,5-1.0 mg/kg, SC): group-specific differences are ab sent when either no dexamphetamine at all (water-treated rats) or high doses of dexamphetamine (2.0 mg/kg) are administered in the present experimental context. Given the finding that dexamphetamine and environmental challenges such as novelty are interchangeable in their effects (Antelman et al 1980), these data indicate that group-specific differences between HR and LR become especially manifest when they are exposed to intermedi ate, environmental or pharmacological challenges, but not when exposed to very small or very large challenges. These findings imply that differential responses of HR and LR are determined not only by different experimen tal conditions, but also by differences in experience.…”
Section: Ex Amphetamine-treated Hr and Lrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heightened stress in abstinent cocaine users is associated with increased drug craving (Fox et al, 2005;Sinha, 2001), and exposure to acute stress during abstinence reliably elicits cocaine seeking in animal models of relapse (Erb et al, 1996(Erb et al, , 2001Sorge and Stewart, 2005). Moreover, stress contributes to the development of sensitization to cocaine (Post and Rose, 1976;Prasad et al, 1995;Meaney et al, 2002) and amphetamine (Antelman et al, 1980). Thus, stress is a significant risk factor in both the initiation of drug taking in drug-naive subjects, and relapse to drug use in abstinent cocaine addicts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%