2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interception, throughfall and stemflow partition in drylands: Global synthesis and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
75
0
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
7
75
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The low stemflow in this study may due to climate and also the accuracy of the experimental device of the stemflow in this study. Previous research confirmed that stemflow was the most variable part of the canopy partitioning (coefficient of variation = 107.8%) [17]. Furthermore, it is known that shrubs generate more stemflow than trees, which has been demonstrated in our results comparing with the results of stemflow in shrub species [45,46].…”
Section: Age Dependence Of Rainfall Partitioningsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The low stemflow in this study may due to climate and also the accuracy of the experimental device of the stemflow in this study. Previous research confirmed that stemflow was the most variable part of the canopy partitioning (coefficient of variation = 107.8%) [17]. Furthermore, it is known that shrubs generate more stemflow than trees, which has been demonstrated in our results comparing with the results of stemflow in shrub species [45,46].…”
Section: Age Dependence Of Rainfall Partitioningsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The bark roughness plays a key role on stemflow generation: species with smooth bark present significantly higher stemflow generation than species with rough bark (Levia & Germer, 2015;Magliano et al, 2019;Xiao & McPherson, 2011). Some field observations (Levia & Frost, 2003) and laboratory experiments (Garcia-Estringana, Alonso-Blázquez, & Alegre, 2010;Xiao & McPherson, 2016) suggest that species with rough bark have more water storage capacity (interception losses) than species with smooth bark preventing stemflow generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater stemflow intensity than rainfall intensity is hydrologically significant at terrestrial ecosystems. This scenario indicates the convergence of the canopy-intercepted rain into the limited area around trunk or branch bases within a certain time period, i.e., 8.0 % and 3.5 % of rain being directed to the trunk base only accounting for 0.3 % and 0.4 % of plot area in the open rainforest (Germer et al, 2010) and undisturbed lowland tropical rainforest (Manfroi et al, 2004), respectively. Besides this, FR, which compared SFV with the RA that would have been collected at the same area as the basal area at an event scale (Herwitz, 1986), is commonly applied to assess the convergence effect via stemflow volume, rainfall amount and basal area (Carlyle-Moses et al, 2010;Siegert and Levia, 2014;Fan et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Stemflow Intensity and Funneling Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%