2010
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2010.2043692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interception Probability and Proximity Effects: Implications in Shielding Design Against Lightning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, from (3) and (6) it can be deduced that the expected substation outage rates depend on the lightning attachment model adopted for the estimation of SFR X , I MSF and N SX of the incoming overhead transmission lines. This is shown in Table II, where the mean time between failures, MTBF, of the substation is evaluated based on different lightning attachment models [16], [18]- [22] and by employing the lightning crest current distribution suggested in [15]. From Table II it is obvious that the MTBF of the evaluated substation varies significantly among lightning attachment models, attaining values approximately from 150 to 450 years.…”
Section: Lightning Risk Assessment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, from (3) and (6) it can be deduced that the expected substation outage rates depend on the lightning attachment model adopted for the estimation of SFR X , I MSF and N SX of the incoming overhead transmission lines. This is shown in Table II, where the mean time between failures, MTBF, of the substation is evaluated based on different lightning attachment models [16], [18]- [22] and by employing the lightning crest current distribution suggested in [15]. From Table II it is obvious that the MTBF of the evaluated substation varies significantly among lightning attachment models, attaining values approximately from 150 to 450 years.…”
Section: Lightning Risk Assessment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, depending on transmission line geometry, the striking distance and interception radius of the shield wire may be affected by the presence of the neighboring phase conductor; this was raised by Peterson and Eriksson [39] in [18] and discussed in detail in [28] and [40]. In fact, the competing upward discharge from a neighboring phase conductor, modifying the extent of development of the connecting upward discharge from the shield wire, may result in a reduction of the striking distance and interception radius of the shield wire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. Tsovilis (e-mail: thtsovil@auth.gr) are with the Department of Electrical Energy, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 54124 Greece. been introduced [27], [28] by implementing a statistical lightning attachment model derived from scale model experiments [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.3 Statistical model [29][30][31][32] Lightning interception probability is an additional parameter that should be incorporated in the design of an efficient LPS. Striking distance and interception radius are described in [29][30][31][32] as statistical quantities following a normal distribution with a mean value and a standard deviation. Both quantities (R and S in Fig.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expressions (2)- (5) of the rolling sphere model and the elliptical model are formulated for the special case of 50% interception probability, referred to as critical interception. Critical interception radius (R c ) and critical striking distance (S c ) are expressed in (6) and (7) [29][30][31][32]. The corresponding factors of the statistical model are shown in Table 2 S…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%