1972
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(72)90004-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interception de la pluie par la végétation forestière estimation de l'interception journalière à l'aide d'un modèle mathématique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average annual interceptions for the 1986-2012 period were 35% and 25% under spruce and beech stands, respectively (Table 1, Suplementary materials). These data were comparable with those published by Viville et al (1993) and Dambrine et al (1998b) for the same spruce plot during a summer period (34-35%) and for the same beech plot (Biron, 1994;25%) or with other similar spruce and beech plantations (Delfs, 1965;Nihlgård, 1970;Bultot et al, 1972;Johnson, 1990;Staelens et al, 2008;Berger et al, 2008).…”
Section: Water Fluxessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The average annual interceptions for the 1986-2012 period were 35% and 25% under spruce and beech stands, respectively (Table 1, Suplementary materials). These data were comparable with those published by Viville et al (1993) and Dambrine et al (1998b) for the same spruce plot during a summer period (34-35%) and for the same beech plot (Biron, 1994;25%) or with other similar spruce and beech plantations (Delfs, 1965;Nihlgård, 1970;Bultot et al, 1972;Johnson, 1990;Staelens et al, 2008;Berger et al, 2008).…”
Section: Water Fluxessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Trimble and Weitzman (1954) attribute greater summer throughfall during high intensity rain to previously intercepted water being physically beaten from downward sloping leaves'' (Helvey and Patric 1965). Bultot et al (1972) and Wells and Blake (1972) have shown that interception and rainfall intensity are inversely related to each other. For a Pinus radiata forest in Whakarewarewa in New Zealand, Wells and Blake (1972) have observed an increase in interception during the early part of the storm, and a subsequent decrease in interception with increasing intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally accepted that trees intercept more water under scattered showers than under storm events. Bultot et al (1972) reported a 30% decrease in IW in the Belgian Ardennes region when rainfall intensity increased from0.1mmin10minto1mmin10min.DataonPinus radiata also showed a significant decrease in IW with amount of rainfall during a shower, from more than 80% for a few millimetres of rain to less than 20% for 60 mm or more (Humbert and Najjar, 1992). From a duration point of view, Olszewsky (1976) showed that the percentage of water that never reaches the soil in a broadleaved forest in Poland decreased from about 65% to less than 20% when duration of the rain event increased from a few minutes to 16 h.…”
Section: The Difficulties In Estimating Waterflows: Rainfall Charactementioning
confidence: 99%