2017
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00025.2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions: evidence for spatial prediction

Abstract: To accurately time motor responses when intercepting falling balls we rely on an internal model of gravity. However, whether and how such a model is also used to estimate the spatial location of interception is still an open question. Here we addressed this issue by asking 25 participants to intercept balls projected from a fixed location 6 m in front of them and approaching along trajectories with different arrival locations, flight durations, and gravity accelerations (0 and 1). The trajectories were display… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ball was batted by the hitter located at the bottom left corner of the scene. Stationary graphic elements-such as the perimeter of the baseball field, the players, and the overall landscape-provided perspective view and metric cues ( Figure 1A; for further details, see Bosco et al, 2012;Delle Monache et al, 2015, 2017.…”
Section: Visual Scenes and Target-motion Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ball was batted by the hitter located at the bottom left corner of the scene. Stationary graphic elements-such as the perimeter of the baseball field, the players, and the overall landscape-provided perspective view and metric cues ( Figure 1A; for further details, see Bosco et al, 2012;Delle Monache et al, 2015, 2017.…”
Section: Visual Scenes and Target-motion Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Jörges and López‐Moliner ; Russo et al . ; Zago et al . 2011), optimal control of reaching movements (Gaveau et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An internal model of gravity is required because no single sensor can distinguish between gravitational and inertial accelerations according to Einstein's equivalence principle. Indeed, an internal model of gravity has been shown to contribute to interceptions of falling targets (Lacquaniti et al 1993;Tresilian 1997;McIntyre et al 2001;Zago et al 2004;Indovina et al 2005;Jörges and López-Moliner 2017;Russo et al 2017;Zago et al 2011), optimal control of reaching movements (Gaveau et al 2016), perceived duration of gravitational motion (Moscatelli & Lacquaniti 2011), time-to-passage estimates during visual self-motion , naturalness judgments of motion under gravity (La Scaleia et al 2014b;Ceccarelli et al 2018), interpretation of biological motion (Troje & Chang 2013;Maffei et al 2015) and perception of the visual vertical (Van Pelt et al 2005;De Vrijer et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Astronauts initiate catching movements earlier in microgravity than on Earth, as if they expected a priori the effects of gravity on target motion even when absent (McIntyre, Zago, Berthoz, & Lacquaniti, 2001). Likewise, motion direction with respect to gravity and target acceleration influence the estimate of the time to contact in catching tasks in virtual reality (Russo et al, 2017;Senot, Zago, Lacquaniti, & McIntyre, 2005;Zago et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%