1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1985.tb02312.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercellular canaliculi in eccrine sweat glands: an immunoperoxidase study

Abstract: Using an indirect immunoperoxidase technique, both epithelial membrane antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen were identified within the ducts and secretory coils of the eccrine sweat gland. Antibodies to epithelial membrane antigen stained the intercellular canaliculi of the secretory coils, as did those antisera to CEA which showed activity against normal cross-reacting antigen (CEX, NCA). Those without such activity showed minimal or no staining of intercellular canaliculi. There is a difference in antigenic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, subsequent studies demonstrated immunoreactivity for EMA in a variety of simple epithelia that have secretory functions as well as in carcinoma of different origin (4,5). Beyond that, staining of sweat glands and sebaceous glands could be demonstrated (7,(12)(13)(14). In some neoplasms with sweat gland differentiation, the expression of EMA proved to be highly conserved (15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, subsequent studies demonstrated immunoreactivity for EMA in a variety of simple epithelia that have secretory functions as well as in carcinoma of different origin (4,5). Beyond that, staining of sweat glands and sebaceous glands could be demonstrated (7,(12)(13)(14). In some neoplasms with sweat gland differentiation, the expression of EMA proved to be highly conserved (15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of both the anti-rabbit and anti-mouse immunoglobulin peroxidase conjugates in a number of previous studies (Heyderman, 1983;1984a, b;Graham et al, 1985) had indicated that neither of them showed evidence of anti-human activity. Neither of them stained tissue sections when an inappropriate or absorbed negative control serum had been used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most intensely staining monoclonal antibody, DD9E7, identified an antigen which was present in large amounts in 12/14 of pancreatic adenocarcinomas, absent from islets and variably expressed on normal acini ducts and ductules. The antigen was also found in colon and breast carcinomas and a number of normal tissues but its immunohistochemical pattern was different to that found with antibodies against CEA or EMA (Heyderman et al, 1979;Grahame et al, 1985). Consistent staining of polymorphs and macrophages in all sections suggested the antigen may be an NCA-like material (Mach & Putztnaseri, 1972;Von Kleist et al, 1972).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%