2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercalary defects reconstruction of the femur and tibia after primary malignant bone tumour resection. A series of 13 cases

Abstract: Level IV. Retrospective study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Fracture rates for fibula flap reconstruction in combination with a massive allograft have been reported at up to 29 percent; nonunion rates are reported to range from 9 percent to 31 percent, infection rates are up to 23 percent, and in one series, flap loss was reported as 6.5 percent. 12,[27][28][29] Our functional results and complication rates compare favorably with the rates quoted in the literature.…”
Section: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • August 2015supporting
confidence: 83%
“…26 Fracture rates for fibula flap reconstruction in combination with a massive allograft have been reported at up to 29 percent; nonunion rates are reported to range from 9 percent to 31 percent, infection rates are up to 23 percent, and in one series, flap loss was reported as 6.5 percent. 12,[27][28][29] Our functional results and complication rates compare favorably with the rates quoted in the literature.…”
Section: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • August 2015supporting
confidence: 83%
“…A relatively small proportion of bone tumours (< 10%) are located in the meta-diaphyseal region, allowing for segmental resection with preservation of the adjacent joint. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Reconstruction of these defects may be undertaken with an endoprosthesis, an allograft, an autograft or a combination of these modalities. Intercalary allografts may be used for smaller defects.…”
Section: In 35 Patients (47%) At Least One Complication Arose With Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 We were surprised, though, by the strength disparity between fixated femurs and controls because IM nailing has been successfully used in clinical practice for reconstruction of segmental femur defects more extensive than those in our osteotomy. 27,28 Unfortunately, previous biomechanical studies of lytic lesions, as well as traumatic femur fractures, lack either control data on intact femurs or data on the residual weakness of fixated femurs compared with intact femurs. 13,15,20,21,29,30 Accordingly, we were unable to identify a comparison study reporting how much weaker a successfully fixated femur is expected to be than an intact femur in these settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%