PsycEXTRA Dataset 1967
DOI: 10.1037/e509242009-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaural intensity difference Limen

Abstract: Sound-field presentation of an acoustic stimulus which is diotic for time, intensity, and spectrum ..

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work of Domnitz and Colburn (1977) confirmed earlier findings (Rowland and Tobias, 1967;Elfner and Perrott, 1967;Hershkowitz and Durlach, 1969;Yost, 1974;Hafter and DeMaio, 1975;Hafter et al, 1977) that showed that sensitivity to interaural differences was usually diminished when the lateral images were located away from midline by introducing an interaural difference of time or level.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work of Domnitz and Colburn (1977) confirmed earlier findings (Rowland and Tobias, 1967;Elfner and Perrott, 1967;Hershkowitz and Durlach, 1969;Yost, 1974;Hafter and DeMaio, 1975;Hafter et al, 1977) that showed that sensitivity to interaural differences was usually diminished when the lateral images were located away from midline by introducing an interaural difference of time or level.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…With this change in focus, much less attention has been given to the processes that underlie the discrimination of interaural differences of level and how they change with frequency. In general, findings show that the sensitivity of the binaural auditory system to IDLs remains relatively constant across a large range of frequency (Mills, 1960;Rowland and Tobias, 1967;Grantham, 1984), with thresholds found to be in the range of 1-2 dB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…If the reference IID increases, IID thresholds increase also. For reference IIDs of 9 dB, the IID threshold is about 1.2 dB, and for a reference IID of 15 dB, the IID threshold amounts between 1.5 and 2 dB [56,57,58].…”
Section: Psychoacoustic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation suggested that the listeners possibly exploited the ILD as a cue for their judgments along the left-right axis. However, the amount of the observed ILD was about 2 dB or less, which might not be sufficiently large compared to the detection threshold (0.5-0.8 dB [12]). We expected little of the interaural time difference (ITD), which was another important cue for left-right judgment in the field of general spatial hearing.…”
Section: A Acoustic Measurementmentioning
confidence: 88%