2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474x.2007.00133.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interatrial Block: A Novel Risk Factor for Embolic Stroke?

Abstract: IAB could indeed be a novel risk for embolic strokes and further investigation is warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
1
16

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
45
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in accordance with the findings of previous studies [27][28][29] in which IAB was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. However, the underlying mechanism has not been fully explained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are in accordance with the findings of previous studies [27][28][29] in which IAB was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. However, the underlying mechanism has not been fully explained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Nine publications were excluded, because they were letters to the editor, editorials, or reviews; provided insufficient data; or did not examine the defined end points. Ten studies, including 8 data sets on PTFV1, [1][2][3][8][9][10]22,23 6 data sets on maximum PWD, 1,2,8,9,24,25 and 3 data sets on maximum PWA, 1,8,9 were included in this meta-analysis. [1][2][3][8][9][10][22][23][24][25] The ECG appearances of these indices are depicted in Figure 2.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, AF was not adjusted for in these analyses. By contrast, the pooled meta-analysis of the 3 studies that examined maximum PWD as a categorical variable, 2,24,25 increased maximum PWD conferred a 86% significant increase in stroke risk. Of these studies, Kohsaka et al analyzed outcomes of a cohort of subjects in the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study, demonstrating that prolongations in Figure 6.…”
Section: August 2017mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations