2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interatomic potentials for irradiation-induced defects in iron

Abstract: Empirical potentials using embedded atom method are developed for Fe, mainly to study irradiation-induced defects such as self-interstitial atom clusters or dislocation loops. The potentials are fitted using experimental values of solid-state properties, ab initio formation energies of basic point defects and ab initio forces acting on the atoms in the liquid or random state configurations. Various bulk and defect properties are compared to validate the transferability of the new potential. In this paper, we a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
23
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, for larger clusters, GAP18 [93] predicts less stable C15 clusters. These results are not consistent with the DFT calculations [72,83]. The EAM AM04 potential poorly reproduces the energy landscape of C15, while MA07, is much closer to the DFT results [72,112,118].…”
Section: Interstitial Clusterscontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, for larger clusters, GAP18 [93] predicts less stable C15 clusters. These results are not consistent with the DFT calculations [72,83]. The EAM AM04 potential poorly reproduces the energy landscape of C15, while MA07, is much closer to the DFT results [72,112,118].…”
Section: Interstitial Clusterscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…These results are not consistent with the DFT calculations [72,83]. The EAM AM04 potential poorly reproduces the energy landscape of C15, while MA07, is much closer to the DFT results [72,112,118]. In contrast to the 2D loops, the tested GAP18 potential [93] exhibits a limited transferability for the C15 clusters and provides results close to those from AM04.…”
Section: Interstitial Clusterscontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations