2013
DOI: 10.1134/s0097807813010107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interannual variations in the areas of thermokarst lakes in Central Yakutia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same wetting pattern has been described by Boike et al [34], who used Landsat snapshots and found an increase of around 85% from 2002 to 2009 within the strongest wetting part of the CYA study site. The strongest increase in lake area occurred in 2007 after above-average precipitation in the prior year [44]. Furthermore, this particular region has been subject to very strong rates of lake expansion over the last decades due to several factors, including anthropogenic activity and the change of climatic conditions [43,67].…”
Section: Comparison Of Sites and Prior Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same wetting pattern has been described by Boike et al [34], who used Landsat snapshots and found an increase of around 85% from 2002 to 2009 within the strongest wetting part of the CYA study site. The strongest increase in lake area occurred in 2007 after above-average precipitation in the prior year [44]. Furthermore, this particular region has been subject to very strong rates of lake expansion over the last decades due to several factors, including anthropogenic activity and the change of climatic conditions [43,67].…”
Section: Comparison Of Sites and Prior Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the limited extent and availability of very high resolution imagery, the studies were usually focused on rather small, image-footprint limited regions [40][41][42][43]. With the focus on single observations so far, the potentially strong intra-annual variation of water-bodies [27,44] cannot be sufficiently accounted for. Moreover, the diversity of data sources and acquisition timing results in limited comparability between different studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, we investigate here reported changes in total lake area over time, based on previous published literature, and use available monthly precipitation and temperature data, along with daily discharge data records from drainage basins that overlap the areas of reported lake change observation, in order to assess concurrent change patterns. (Plug et al, 2008); 2, Tuktoyuktuk Peninsula (Marsh et al, 2009); 3, Old Crow Basin (Labrecque et al, 2009); 4, Hudson Bay Lowlands (Sannel and Kuhry, 2011); 5, Canada 50-70°N (Carroll et al, 2011); 6, Northwestern Siberia (Smith et al, 2005); 7, Rogovaya (Sannel and Kuhry, 2011); 8, Central Yakutia (Tarasenko, 2013); 9, Nadym and Pur River Basins (Karlsson et al, 2012(Karlsson et al, , 2014; 10, Tavvavouma …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), where lake drainage usually occurs over timescales of years to decades (Marsh et al, 2009). However, the main driving mechanism of changes in lake surface area is not always clear, as lake-surface area may change due to several processes, including (a) changes in precipitation (Plug et al, 2008;Tarasenko, 2013), (b) changes in evapotranspiration (Riordan et al, 2006;Labrecque et al, 2009), (c) lateral drainage caused by shoreline erosion (Marsh et al, 2009;Smith et al, 2005;Jones et al, 2011), (d) internal drainage when underlying permafrost thaws and open taliks appear (Yoshikawa and Hinzman, 2003;Smith et al, 2005;Karlsson et al, 2012Karlsson et al, , 2014, (e) ice-jam flooding (Chen et al, 2014), or (f) terrestrialization, including encroachment of floating mat vegetation and basin infilling of organic matter and sediment (Roach et al, 2011;Sannel and Kuhry, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El uso de esta combinación de bandas ha demostrado ser útil para discriminar diferentes tipos de vegetación y espejos de agua (Tarasenko, 2013), en especial, porque las bandas 4 y 5 capturan la reflectancia en el infrarrojo cercano, y en este segmento del espectro las plantas tienen una alta reflectancia, lo que facilita su identificación y clasificación.…”
Section: Cuantificación Del Espejo De Agua Y Coberturas Vegetalesunclassified