Interactives and Visitor Learning

Abstract

Interactives—computers and other multimedia components, physical manipulatives (including whole‐body and tabletop activities), and simulations—occur in all types of museums. There is considerable interest in the nature of the learning that happens when visitors use interactives. Museum professionals have enlisted constructivist theory to support the notion that interactive elements are invaluable components of any exhibition experience, and are effective learning tools that enable active visitor engagement. Interactives are also seen as vital to sustaining institutional image and expanding institutional popularity. Despite the increasing use of interactives in exhibitions and the substantial investments being made in their design and maintenance, there is a paucity of research as to whether these constructivist assumptions are supported. There is little work exploring visitors' perceptions of specific types of interactives, or the role of interactivity in the visitor experience generally. Museum staff thus have a limited ability to make informed decisions about the level and type of interactivity that might enhance exhibition experiences. This paper describes a collaborative effort in 2001 by researchers at the Powerhouse Museum (PHM), Sydney; the Institute for Learning Innovation (the Institute), Annapolis, Maryland; and Curtin University of Technology (Curtin) and Scitech Discovery Centre (Scitech), both in Perth, Western Australia. This study investigated two aspects of interactivity: 1) visitor perceptions of interactivity in two different contexts, a museum and a science center; and 2) the types of short‐ and long‐term learning that resulted from use of interactives in these two institutions.

Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: Testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experiences using structural equation modelling

“…Many of these outcomes, particularly in relation to changes in actual environmental behaviour, may only become apparent weeks or months after the experience (Adelman et al, 2000;Anderson, Storksdieck & Spock, 2006;Ballantyne and Packer, 2009b;Falk, et al, 2004). Thus the dependent variables in this study included short-term changes in knowledge, attitudes and behavioural intentions measured immediately after the visit, and long-term changes in environmental knowledge, attitudes and actual behaviour measured four months later.…”

Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition

“…Thus, experiences occurring after the visit frequently play an important role in determining, in the long term, what is actually "learned" in the museum. Recent longitudinal studies show that the learning that results from a museum experience does change over time, and not always just by declining (Anderson, 1999;Adelman et al, 2001;Falk et al, 2004;Goldman et al, 2001;Medved, 1998).…”

Teaching STEM education through dialogue and transformative learning: global significance and local interactions in Mexico and the UK

“…Here the emphasis is on collaboration and communication and the papers indicate that non-formal learning for teachers is critical and arises in and through social interaction, interaction that enables people to mutually engage in cooperation and co-participation and to become familiar with and understand seemingly technical and complex issues and problems (Falk et al 2004;Gee 1999;Rennie et al 2003). Placing the agency for directing STEM within the community could provide a catalyst for promoting STEM careers and genuinely opening opportunities for marginalised groups such as girls, women, lower socio-economic groups and indigenous or ethnic communities.…”