2015
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1016536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive whiteboards: do teachers really use them interactively?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is evident that the incorporation of technological advancements in various educational methods has led to a user-friendly, supportive and flexible learning environment which is a hallmark of today’s educational system in advanced countries (Ketterl et al , 2011). Various scholars (Danielson et al , 2014; Farooq, 2016; Nair et al , 2015; Tatli and Kiliç, 2015) have reported the positive impact of technology integration on students’ learning outcomes. Therefore, many developed countries, such as UK, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, have already undertaken various projects for integrating modern advancements of information technology (IT) in their education system (Danielson et al , 2014; Farooq, 2016; Nair et al , 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is evident that the incorporation of technological advancements in various educational methods has led to a user-friendly, supportive and flexible learning environment which is a hallmark of today’s educational system in advanced countries (Ketterl et al , 2011). Various scholars (Danielson et al , 2014; Farooq, 2016; Nair et al , 2015; Tatli and Kiliç, 2015) have reported the positive impact of technology integration on students’ learning outcomes. Therefore, many developed countries, such as UK, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, have already undertaken various projects for integrating modern advancements of information technology (IT) in their education system (Danielson et al , 2014; Farooq, 2016; Nair et al , 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding shows parallelism with the results reported by Koçak and Gülcü (2013) and is important because teachers who have adopted computer and touchscreen technologies in their daily lives are ready to use this technology both in mental and in physical terms. Tatli and Kiliç (2016) also reported that more computer use increases the use of interactive boards more effectively. This is also supported (question 4) by the teachers' positive attitudes towards using interactive boards in educational settings (80.96%) over negative attitudes (19.04%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But unfortunately, despite this massive rapid shift from the black/white boards to the IWBs, teachers have been faced with adapting to the use of the highly technological tool in their classes (Alparslan andIçbay, 2017: 1779). For this reason, it is extremely important to provide the technical education and support needed by teachers to use interactive boards (BECTA, 2011;Tatli and Kiliç, 2016;Teck, 2013). It is because although there are many claimed benefits for IWB technology, it is the duty of the teachers to exploit the positive features of IWBs and integrate them into their current teaching methodologies (Gashan and Alshumaimeri, 2015: 176).…”
Section: Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, IWB materials were reported to have increased active participation and engagement from learners [17]. IWBs were also reported to have generated excitement and a positive attitude to learning [18]. Literature shows that IWBs contain important Mathematical materials, which enable learners to gain access to a variety of unusual solution sets [19].…”
Section: Interactive Whiteboard Teaching and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%