Interactive user interface and inclusion

Karuović, Dijana; Attila, Vastag; Erika, E; Radosav, Dragica; Tasić, Ivan; Vladimir, Karuovic

doi:10.1109/sisy.2012.6339568

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…During the literature review, we located 99 articles with common themes surrounding social model perspectives (Guo et al, 2005;George et al, 2010), government policies (Frix and Pal, 2010;Mavrou, 2011) and inclusion (Dijana et al, 2012;Ratliffe et al, 2012).…”

Section: Socialmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, a lack of societal incentives for the increased inclusion of those with disabilities could aggravate the digital disability divide. The literature review revealed 60 unique sources focused on the societal aspect of the digital disability divide, with the main contributions focused on accessibility (Mavrou, 2011) and inclusion (Dijana et al, 2012). Better societal rehabilitation opportunities can help reduce this digital divide (Imrie, 1997).…”

Section: Societalmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Digital disability divide in information society

Sachdeva

Tuikka

Kimppa

et al. 2015

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to create a conceptual framework, based on a structured literature review, to analyze the digital disability divide and help find solutions for it. A digital disability divide exists between people with impairments and those without impairments. Multiple studies have shown that people without impairments are less likely to own a computer or have an Internet connection than are people with impairments. However, the digital disability divide is seen in relation not only to access but also to accessibility and use. For people with impairments, new technological innovations offer solutions for everyday challenges, such as finding information, communicating with others and using electronic services. Design/methodology/approach – For this study, 4,778 conference and journal publications were systematically analyzed. Findings – A number of key findings emerged. This field is relatively new, and the literature is highly focused on the technological and social aspects of the digital disability divide, with technology and societal attributes being the core sub-attributes for a comprehensive model. The previous literature did not significantly study the consequences of the financial situation of individuals; rather, the predominant focus was on the have-nots and countries with low income potentials. Furthermore, motivation reveals a compelling case within the digital disability divide subset. Originality/value – The review provides a consolidated view of past research on the general topic of the digital disability divide and the attributes that affect it.

show abstract