1987
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(87)90274-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive solutions for the linear multiobjective transportation problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step 5: We get an equivalent crisp model, which can be formulated as: Maximize Xmn+1 subject to The example is solved by the given interactive approach in [6]. The procedure begins with constructing a linear compromise solution and a search is conducted among all non-dominated solutions corresponding to extreme points adjacent to the most preferred extreme point.…”
Section: Theorem: Definementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Step 5: We get an equivalent crisp model, which can be formulated as: Maximize Xmn+1 subject to The example is solved by the given interactive approach in [6]. The procedure begins with constructing a linear compromise solution and a search is conducted among all non-dominated solutions corresponding to extreme points adjacent to the most preferred extreme point.…”
Section: Theorem: Definementioning
confidence: 99%
“…can write k L ( λ, K) with p = 1,2,and ∞ as follows: The family of distance functions for solutions of the given fuzzy linear membership approach and the interactive procedure [6] are summarized in table 3. Table 3 Objective function The family of the distance functions for solutions of the given fuzzy approach and the interactive procedure [6] are summarized in table 3.…”
Section: Theorem: Definementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multi-objective optimization problem is solved using some relatively simple methods and the solution is presented to DM. The methods in this category include the Method of Global Criterion (e.g., Ringuest & Rinks, 1987;Miettinen, 1999;Caballero, Luque, Molina, & Ruiz, 2005) and Proximal Bundle Method (e.g., Kiwiel, 1990;Miettinen & Mäkelä, 1995).…”
Section: No-preference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison has been made with the approaches of Li and Lai (2000), Bit, Biswal, and Alam (1992), Ringuest and Rinks (1987), Quddoos, Javaid, Ali, and Khalid (2013), and Quddoos, Javaid, and Khalid (2013) in Table 4. (Bit, Biswal, & Alam, 1992); c (Ringuest & Rinks, 1987); d (Quddoos, Javaid, Ali, & Khalid, 2013); e (Quddoos, Javaid, & Khalid, 2013) Figure 6. Graphical representation of solutions at different priorities Now consider the second example of a multi-objective assignment problem using the proposed model.…”
Section: Graphical Representation Of Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%