1982
DOI: 10.1177/003754978203800504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive simulation on a microcomputer

Abstract: has been a research associate at the Centre in Simulation at Lancaster University in the north of England for the past four years. He is editor of the Centre's Simulation Newsletter and has worked chiefly on combined simulations. After graduating from Oxford University in mathematics in 1966, he spent a year at Jodrell Bank where he received an MS in radio astronomy in 1968 for his work on flare stars. Undecided about how best to spend the next 50 years (or so) of his life, he hitchhiked around various parts o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crookes and his group at the University of Lancaster in England showed that small microcomputers, such as the Apple II, were adequate for much VIS work (Crookes 1982;Crookes and Valentine 1982;Ellison, Herschdorfer, and Tunnicliffe-Wilson 1982). Subsequently, others used small microcomputers for VIS modelling (for instance, see O'Keefe and Davies 1986).…”
Section: Ntroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crookes and his group at the University of Lancaster in England showed that small microcomputers, such as the Apple II, were adequate for much VIS work (Crookes 1982;Crookes and Valentine 1982;Ellison, Herschdorfer, and Tunnicliffe-Wilson 1982). Subsequently, others used small microcomputers for VIS modelling (for instance, see O'Keefe and Davies 1986).…”
Section: Ntroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ellison, Herschdorfer, and Tunnicliffe Wilson (1982) programmed a simple simulation model on two machines. On a large computer, the programming required 25 hours, spread over 21 days; compiling the program took five seconds of machine time, and simulating a week of activity required one-tenth second; the costs for programming and machine time totaled E745.…”
Section: Simulation's Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many microcomputers are designed for interpreted languages, and their low capital costs allow cheap interactive operations. Third, people find dials, levers, and "mice" easier to use than keyboards, and pictures a lot more intelligible than numbers, so calculations can be much more meaningful with hardware that accepts analog inputs and produces graphic displays (Ellison, Herschdorfer, & Tunnicliffe Wilson, 1982). Such hardware is approximately equivalent to a microcomputer, so microcomputers would be desirable for input and display even if the primary simulation programs execute on large computers (Kepple, 1982).…”
Section: Simulation's Futurementioning
confidence: 99%