2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive requirements prioritization using a genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
50
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…( Tonella et al, 2013) proposed an Interactive Genetic Algorithm (IGA) for requirements prioritization, in their work they take into consideration the effectiveness, efficiency, and robustness to the errors that may occurs in decision making process. As they assessed their technique they concluded that the IGA performs better than Incomplete Analytic Hierarchy Process (IAHP).…”
Section: Data Mining and Machine Learning Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Tonella et al, 2013) proposed an Interactive Genetic Algorithm (IGA) for requirements prioritization, in their work they take into consideration the effectiveness, efficiency, and robustness to the errors that may occurs in decision making process. As they assessed their technique they concluded that the IGA performs better than Incomplete Analytic Hierarchy Process (IAHP).…”
Section: Data Mining and Machine Learning Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3], a technique is presented for partially automating the prioritization of requirements and raw feature requests in large-scale elicitation processes. Another approach in [19] applied genetic algorithm for prioritizing requirements in order to make prioritization scalable by reducing the number of pairwise comparisons. However, no particular method or approach has been proposed for performing the prioritization of non-functional requirements according to their relationship with functional requirements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods on requirements prioritization have been introduced in recent years, the most widely known of which being Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [16], Cost-Value approach [1], Wieger"s method [17], Value-Oriented requirements Prioritization (VOP) [18], and more recently there is a method which applied interactive genetic algorithm to prioritize requirements [19]. Although these methods have contributed a lot to software development process, they are not suitable for prioritizing non-functional requirements from the point that they have not addressed the prioritization of non-functional requirements according to their relationship with functional requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides software testing, search-based optimization techniques have also been applied to fault localization [65], program analysis [76], software refactoring [29,30,55], cost estimation [19], project scheduling [1,18], decisions design optimization [10], automated negotiation [17], source code parallelization [57], requirement engineering [27,64], variability management [41], and so on.…”
Section: Search-based Software Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%