Abstract:A technology enhanced learning and teaching (TELT) solution, radiological anatomy (RA) eLearning, composed of a range of identification-based and guided learning activities related to normal and pathological X-ray images, was devised for the Year 1 nervous and locomotor course at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton. Its effectiveness was evaluated using a questionnaire, pre- and post-tests, focus groups, summative assessment, and tracking data. Since introduced in 2009, a total of 781 students h… Show more
“…Technological advances offer potential improvement in teaching methods but they need to be evaluated and used appropriately 34,35 . For example, online-learning has been found to be useful in teaching basic knowledge and simple technical skills, but not in understanding complex spatial anatomy 36 .…”
Objective:Knowledge of ENT is important for many doctors, but undergraduate time is limited. This study aimed to identify what is thought about ENT knowledge amongst non-ENT doctors, and the key topics that the curriculum should focus on.Methods:Doctors were interviewed about their views of ENT knowledge amongst non-ENT doctors, and asked to identify key topics. These topics were then used to devise a questionnaire, which was distributed to multiple stakeholders in order to identify the key topics.Results:ENT knowledge was generally thought to be poor amongst doctors, and it was recommended that undergraduate ENT topics be kept simple. The highest rated topics were: clinical examination; when to refer; acute otitis media; common emergencies; tonsillitis and quinsy; management of ENT problems by non-ENT doctors; stridor and stertor; otitis externa; and otitis media with effusion.Conclusion:This study identified a number of key ENT topics, and will help to inform future development of ENT curricula.
“…Technological advances offer potential improvement in teaching methods but they need to be evaluated and used appropriately 34,35 . For example, online-learning has been found to be useful in teaching basic knowledge and simple technical skills, but not in understanding complex spatial anatomy 36 .…”
Objective:Knowledge of ENT is important for many doctors, but undergraduate time is limited. This study aimed to identify what is thought about ENT knowledge amongst non-ENT doctors, and the key topics that the curriculum should focus on.Methods:Doctors were interviewed about their views of ENT knowledge amongst non-ENT doctors, and asked to identify key topics. These topics were then used to devise a questionnaire, which was distributed to multiple stakeholders in order to identify the key topics.Results:ENT knowledge was generally thought to be poor amongst doctors, and it was recommended that undergraduate ENT topics be kept simple. The highest rated topics were: clinical examination; when to refer; acute otitis media; common emergencies; tonsillitis and quinsy; management of ENT problems by non-ENT doctors; stridor and stertor; otitis externa; and otitis media with effusion.Conclusion:This study identified a number of key ENT topics, and will help to inform future development of ENT curricula.
“…Through interactive material in digital repository, immediate feedback and problem solving activities it can catalyse active participation [4,5]. Through computer enabled three-dimensional visualization, it can offset the limitations of verbal descriptions in teaching anatomy [6][7][8][9][10]. For the current tech-savvy generation, it can offer a platform to study through a media they enjoy.…”
Section: The Effectiveness Of Early Clinical Exposure and E-learning mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chopra et al found that performance after teaching with computer assisted visual aid was significantly better [8]. Webb and Choi found that the performance of students in summative assessment was better after radiological anatomy e-learning solutions [10]. In the study conducted by Hallgren, the mean scores in both midterm and final exams of the students who had used the web-based instructional materials (Group 1) were significantly higher (28.5 with p<0.001) than the mean scores of those students (Groups 2 & 3) who did not use the material (26 & 24 in midterm and 26 for both groups in final exams) [14].…”
Objectives:The primary objective of this study was to determine if Early Clinical Exposure (ECE) and E-learning can be effective alternative methods of teaching anatomy for the first-year medical students. Secondary objectives were to determine (a) if there was gender bias with these methods and (b) if these methods influenced high, average or low achievers selectively.
Materials and Methods:Study was conducted in the department of anatomy with 150 first-year medical students participating in it. Students were randomly divided into three groups of 50 each. Six selected topics were taught to the three groups using ECE, e-learning and traditional lecture alternatively. After each session, a test was conducted using 20 objective questions to assess the learning outcome. Average score of the groups were analysed using Fisher one-way ANOVA or Welch test. Multiple comparisons were done using post-hoc tests when the difference between the average scores was found to be significant. Gender difference in the scores for each method was noted. Learning outcome of high, average and low achievers with ECE and e-learning were compared.Results: Average total scores after ECE were comparable to lecture and superior to e-learning in five of the six sessions. E-learning, however, was not as effective as ECE in improving the test scores. Except for one group, where the boys outperformed the girls after e-learning, girls outperformed the boys in all the groups with all the three methods of instruction. ECE or e-learning did not influence high, average or low achievers selectively.
Conclusion:Based on the learning outcome, ECE can be an effective method to teach Anatomy in the described format. E-learning did not improve the test scores in the self-study format used in this study, but, 3D visualization can benefit the students when used as an adjunct to the traditional methods.
“…Only 43 % of universities offer e-learning and usually not as a required course. Radiology is particularly suitable for e-learning [24,25] since images can be analyzed and evaluated in a manner very similar to that of actual radiology. E-learning can be helpful not only in student education but also in radiology continuing education [11,26] and in other professions in the healthcare industry [27].…”
Section: Fig 5 Disadvantages Of Integrative Teachingmentioning
Purpose: To survey integrative teaching in radiology at German universities.
Materials and Methods: A questionnaire about radiological education was sent electronically to all 37 chairpersons of university radiology departments in Germany. The questions included the course type, teaching methods, concept, perception, and advantages and disadvantages of integrative teaching. Statistical analysis was performed with nonparametric statistics and chi-square test.
Results: The survey was considered representative with a return rate of 68?%. Integrative teaching is established at 4/5 of all departments. Integrative teaching is well accepted with an acceptance rate that is significantly higher in so-called ?Modellstudieng?ngen? [model courses of study] (100?%) compared to conventional courses of study (72?%). The advantages of integrative teaching include linking of content (92?%) and preparation for interdisciplinary work (76?%). The disadvantages include high effort (75?%) and time (67?%) for organization. Furthermore, there is a risk that basic radiological facts and knowledge cannot be conveyed and that the visibility of radiology as an independent discipline is lost. Conventional radiological teaching has a similarly high acceptance (84?%) compared to integrative courses (76?%).
Conclusion: Integrative teaching has a high acceptance among chairpersons in radiology in Germany despite the greater effort. A good interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for integrative teaching and at the same time this can be conveyed to the students. However, the visibility of radiology as a discipline and the possibility to cover basic radiological content must be ensured. Therefore, both conventional courses and integrative teaching seems reasonable, especially in cross-disciplinary subjects such as radiology.
Key Points
??Both integrative teaching and conventional radiological teaching are highly accepted. The advantages include the linking of multidisciplinary content and the preparation for interdisciplinary cooperation. The disadvantages include more time and effort for organization and reduced visibility of cross-disciplinary subjects.
Citation Format:
??Dettmer S, Weidemann J, Fischer V et?al. Integrative Teaching in Radiology ? A Survey 2015; 187: 260???268
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.