2017 23rd International Conference on Virtual System &Amp; Multimedia (VSMM) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/vsmm.2017.8346278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive Past: From 3D reconstruction to Augmented and Virtual Reality applied to archaeological heritage. The medieval site of Bastia St. Michele (Cavaion Veronese, Verona, Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vast majority of immersive technology cultural heritage applications have been developed for archaeological sites and monuments that are visible and physically accessible to the public. Most commonly, further, their content includes 3D reconstructions of how the archaeological sites and monuments would have looked like or would have been used during distinctive moments of their biography (see, for example, Vlahakis et al, 2001;Vlahakis et al, 2002;Reilly et al, 2006;Schöning, Krüger & Müller, 2006;Paelke & Sester, 2010;Eggert, Hücker & Paelke, 2014;Pierdicca et al, 2015;Galatis et al, 2016;Pierdicca et al, 2016;Morandi & Tremari, 2017;Pedersen et al, 2017;Bekele et al, 2018;Bruno et al, 2019;Dragoni et al, 2019;Liritzis, Volonakis & Vosinakis, 2021). Applications for non-accessible sites and monuments are limited in number and they too provide 3D reconstructions of the "invisible' antiquities they promote (Capone, 2011;Martínez et al, 2015;Pierdicca et al, 2015;Unger & Kvetina, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of immersive technology cultural heritage applications have been developed for archaeological sites and monuments that are visible and physically accessible to the public. Most commonly, further, their content includes 3D reconstructions of how the archaeological sites and monuments would have looked like or would have been used during distinctive moments of their biography (see, for example, Vlahakis et al, 2001;Vlahakis et al, 2002;Reilly et al, 2006;Schöning, Krüger & Müller, 2006;Paelke & Sester, 2010;Eggert, Hücker & Paelke, 2014;Pierdicca et al, 2015;Galatis et al, 2016;Pierdicca et al, 2016;Morandi & Tremari, 2017;Pedersen et al, 2017;Bekele et al, 2018;Bruno et al, 2019;Dragoni et al, 2019;Liritzis, Volonakis & Vosinakis, 2021). Applications for non-accessible sites and monuments are limited in number and they too provide 3D reconstructions of the "invisible' antiquities they promote (Capone, 2011;Martínez et al, 2015;Pierdicca et al, 2015;Unger & Kvetina, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%