2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive effects of nitrogen fertilization and irrigation on grain yield, canopy temperature, and nitrogen use efficiency in overhead sprinkler-irrigated durum wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
62
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cependant, cette interaction est significative sur la paille à la récolte. Selon Mon et al (2016), la fertilisation azotée affecte significativement la biomasse aérienne à partir d'un seuil d'humidité. Ce qui pourrait expliquer les effets observés de cette interaction aux différentes dates de prélèvement.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Cependant, cette interaction est significative sur la paille à la récolte. Selon Mon et al (2016), la fertilisation azotée affecte significativement la biomasse aérienne à partir d'un seuil d'humidité. Ce qui pourrait expliquer les effets observés de cette interaction aux différentes dates de prélèvement.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A high clearance, self-propelled tractor (Hamby Inc., Lubbock, TX) was used to apply N under the sprinkler, just prior to an irrigation. It used variable-rate Turbodrop Variable Rate fertilizer nozzles (Greenleaf Technologies, Covington, LA) on drops at 1-m horizontal spacing, and with a Raven SCS 440 controller (Raven Industries, Sioux Falls, SD), Raven butterfly valve, Raven GPS, and flow meter (Mon et al, 2016). Agrotain Plus was added to UAN at the rate of 0.8% by weight for 2013 to 2015.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the fertilized plots, because mineralization rates would be expected to be higher in fertilized than in the control plots [28], it is estimated that they received a rate of about 230 kg N ha −1 cycle −1 (150 from applied fertilizer + 80 from soil mineralization). Thus, if the response of yields to N fertilization was linear, yields would be around 7600 kg ha −1 , but in reality, this response is well known to increase less as N availability is increased [23,29]. In addition to mineral N resulting from OM mineralization in the present study, another contributing factor could have been related with reduced ammonia losses under CA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Gupta et al (2009) [22] found a mean AE N for the 150 kg N ha −1 of 16.4 kg grain kg −1 N with a mean yield associated with that treatment of 4545 kg ha −1 , across three growing cycles and two soil types, with comparable N use efficiency, but lower yields than those recorded in this study. In a study conducted in Arizona, U. S. A., Mon et al (2016) [23] reported mean AE N and associated grain wheat yields during two years (2013 and 2014), for the treatment of 168 kg N ha −1 (their highest yielding treatment), across five irrigation levels, of 17 kg grain kg −1 N and approximately, 4300 kg ha −1 , respectively (in 2013) and 9 kg N ha −1 and approximately 3400 kg ha −1 , respectively (in 2014). In this same study [23], much lower AE N and yield levels were reported as N rates increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation