2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10490-018-09640-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive effects of executive compensation, firm performance and corporate governance: Evidence from an Asian market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
6
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Al Farooque et al (2019) study 432 Thai listed firms post Asian crisis between 2000 and 2011 and argue that type II agency conflicts between large shareholders and minority shareholders are more likely to be the dominant conflict of interest in Thai firms than the type I conflict between shareholders and management. The study aims to investigate the tridirectional (e.g.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Al Farooque et al (2019) study 432 Thai listed firms post Asian crisis between 2000 and 2011 and argue that type II agency conflicts between large shareholders and minority shareholders are more likely to be the dominant conflict of interest in Thai firms than the type I conflict between shareholders and management. The study aims to investigate the tridirectional (e.g.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Al Farooque et al (2019) is an interesting paper, there are a few criticisms and improvements that can be made. First, the variables used in the models to study the relationship with Type II agency issues are exactly the same as those used in many studies that predominantly examine the Type I agency issue.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jensen and Murphy (1990) in their work stated that there exists pay-performance sensitivity and firm performance shows a positive influence in CEO pay. The positive relationship between the two aspects is being given by Farooque et al (2019), McGuire (2018, Waddock and Graves (1997), Griffin and Mahon (1997) while the negative relationship is indicated by Amewu and Alagidede (2021), Hasnan et al (2020), Kline et al (2017), Wright and Ferris (1997) among others. Works of Nicola et al (2016) and Firth et al (2006) established no relationship between both the constructs.…”
Section: G a L L E Y P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, they can monitor strategy, performance and risk, and encourage good corporate citizenship and organizational accountability. Specifically, Farooque et al (2019) research the interaction of executive compensation, corporate performance and corporate governance in different systems and governance environments in emerging market economies. Gulati et al (2020) analyze the influence of the size of the board of directors, the turnover rate of CEOs, the number of foreign directors and the level of knowledge, and political relations on the company's performance.…”
Section: Measures Of Corporate Governancementioning
confidence: 99%