1986
DOI: 10.1002/spe.4380160309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive documentation

Abstract: Documents are increasingly often read from computer screens rather than from paper. This paper describes a tool, called GUIDE, which allows readers of computer‐based documents to peruse these documents at any desired level of detail. GUIDE covers any kind of textual document, and is designed for environments where both author and readers are lay users.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most hypermedia systems, however, provide point-to-node links. For example, Guide (Brown 1986) provides links from any piece of text. It is also possible for some systems to provide point-to-point links.…”
Section: Link Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most hypermedia systems, however, provide point-to-node links. For example, Guide (Brown 1986) provides links from any piece of text. It is also possible for some systems to provide point-to-point links.…”
Section: Link Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sity of Durham, research is in progress on how to redocumen; software systems within the GUIDE [2] hypertext documentation tool running on a Sun Workstation. The investigation is being performed by redocumenting a C cross-referencing program developed at the British Telecom Research Laboratories as part of the DOCMAN [6] suite of cross-referencing tools.…”
Section: Research Direct Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important issue is whether this type of index is suftlcient to make the Hypertext system easier and more efficient to use. "If the computer systems simply initiates paper, readers will, if they have the choice, always prefer paper" [18]. Previous~search has indicated that, in technical documentation, readers rely most heavily on the index to help them fmd information [5], [19].…”
Section: Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%