2012
DOI: 10.3354/cr01054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive coupling of a regional climate model and a chemical transport model: evaluation and preliminary results on ozone and aerosol feedback

Abstract: This study presents an interactive coupling system of the regional climate model RegCM3 and the chemistry transport model CAMx, called RegCMCAMx. This system provides an advancement from offline coupling methods already in use. In RegCMCAMx, the radiative effects of tropospheric ozone, sulfates and black and organic carbon were considered. A series of annual sensitivity simulations were carried out for the year 2005 over a European domain, where ozone and/or aerosols were interactively coupled (taking their ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(82 reference statements)
7
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A very similar result is provided by Huszar et al (2012) both in terms of monthly and hourly variation.…”
Section: The Validation Of the Modeling Systemsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A very similar result is provided by Huszar et al (2012) both in terms of monthly and hourly variation.…”
Section: The Validation Of the Modeling Systemsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Compared to Huszar et al (2012), our modeling system performs better in terms of correlation, with r = 0.6 and r = 0.67 for hourly and daily values against 0.51 and 0.53 in the later study which used an earlier version of the RegCMCAMx coupled system. This improvement probably lies in the duration of the data of comparison: in a 10-year time frame, the main drivers of the variability are the diurnal and monthly variations which contribute to an overall correlation in a significant way (Hogrefe et al, 2001).…”
Section: The Validation Of the Modeling Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations