2016
DOI: 10.1118/1.4947484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive contour delineation of organs at risk in radiotherapy: Clinical evaluation on NSCLC patients

Abstract: An interactive, accurate, fast, and easy-to-use computer-assisted system able to segment various OARs required for thoracic radiation therapy has been presented and clinically evaluated. The introduction of the proposed system in clinical routine may offer valuable new option to radiation oncologists in performing RTP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the known drawbacks of manual and semi-automated approaches and the emerging success of automated contouring, to date, the latter solution is still underrepresented in clinical routine [151,[219][220][221]. This indicates the necessity to extend the evaluation and cross-validation of popular delineation approaches in a large-scale multi-center environment.…”
Section: Delineationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the known drawbacks of manual and semi-automated approaches and the emerging success of automated contouring, to date, the latter solution is still underrepresented in clinical routine [151,[219][220][221]. This indicates the necessity to extend the evaluation and cross-validation of popular delineation approaches in a large-scale multi-center environment.…”
Section: Delineationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical applicability of automatic contouring software is well-reported for regions such as head and neck, breast, and abdomen [2][3][4][5][6]. For the lung, there are a number of studies reporting automatic contouring [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Some focus solely on a single method and OAR or the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) and only evaluate the accuracy of the method without any clinical implications such as time gain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies address the usability of atlas-based contouring for the thorax OARs [9,14]. Dolz et al provides a framework for a region-based contouring technique in clinical practice [13], they advise further investigation into more accurate atlas selection methods to improve the clinical usability. All these methods should be followed by manual correction of the imperfections of the software contouring with the techniques currently available to assess the clinical usability of these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although considerable attention has been devoted to the automated segmentation of anatomical structures in CT, literature on esophagus segmentation remains scarce, with results far from being fully satisfactory. Existing approaches that can successfully segment different structures in CT often fail to segment the esophagus . One of the main reasons for this is the absence of consistent intensity contrast between the esophagus and surrounding tissues in thoracic CT scans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%