Interactive computer-based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people

Abstract

Background The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that the number of obese or overweight individuals worldwide will increase to 1.5 billion by 2015. Chronic diseases associated with overweight or obesity include diabetes, heart disease, hypertension and stroke. Objectives To assess the effects of interactive computer-based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people. Search methods We searched several electronic databases, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS and PsycINFO, through 25 May 2011. We also searched clinical trials registries to identify studies. We scanned reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews. Selection criteria Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials or quasi-randomized controlled trials that evaluated interactive computer-based weight loss or weight maintenance programs in adults with overweight or obesity. We excluded trials if the duration of the intervention was less than four weeks or the loss to follow-up was greater than 20% overall. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently extracted study data and assessed risk of bias. Where interventions, control conditions, outcomes and time frames were similar between studies, we combined study data using meta-analysis. Main results We included 14 weight loss studies with a total of 2537 participants, and four weight maintenance studies with a total of 1603 participants. Treatment duration was between four weeks and 30 months. At six months, computer-based interventions led to greater weight loss than minimal interventions (mean difference (MD) −1.5 kg; 95% confidence interval (CI) −2.1 to −0.9; two trials) but less weight loss than in-person treatment (MD 2.1 kg; 95% CI 0.8 to 3.4; one trial). At six months, computer-based interventions were superior to a minimal control intervention in limiting weight regain (MD −0.7 kg; 95% CI −1.2 to −0.2; two trials), but not superior to infrequent in-person treatment (MD 0.5 kg; 95% −0.5 to 1.6; two trials). We did not observe consistent differences in dietary or physical activity behaviors between intervention and control groups in either weight loss or weight maintenance trials. Three weight loss studies estimated the costs of computer-based interventions compared to usual care, however two of the studies were 11 and 28 years old, and recent advances in technology render these estimates unlikely to be applicable to current or future interventions, while the third study was conducted in active duty military personnel, and it is unclear whether the costs are relevant to other settings. One weight loss study reported the cost-effectiveness ratio for a weekly in-person weight loss intervention relative to a computer-based intervention as USD 7177 (EUR 5678) per life year gained (80% CI USD 3055 to USD 60,291 (EUR 2417 to EUR 47,702)). It is unclear whether this could be extrapolated to other studies. No data were identified on adverse events, morbidity, complications or health-rel...

Digital and social media opportunities for dietary behaviour change

“…In the present paper, only food behaviour/weight loss-related interventions are explored. A Cochrane meta-analysis of weight loss/maintenance trials by Weiland et al (41) revealed that webbased interventions resulted in greater weight loss when compared with control conditions but significantly less weight loss compared with face-to-face interventions. This is similar to findings from four other meta-analyses (41)(42)(43)(44) .…”

“…A Cochrane meta-analysis of weight loss/maintenance trials by Weiland et al (41) revealed that webbased interventions resulted in greater weight loss when compared with control conditions but significantly less weight loss compared with face-to-face interventions. This is similar to findings from four other meta-analyses (41)(42)(43)(44) . Reed et al (42) conducted a meta-analysis of eleven randomised controlled trials and reported additional weight loss when web-based interventions were used to supplement face-to-face interventions; however, substituting face-toface interventions with web-based interventions resulted in significantly less weight loss.…”

How can weight‐loss app designers' best engage and support users? A qualitative investigation

“…Such applications (or "apps") provide an attractive, low cost, self-delivered way to prompt and support users to change their own behaviour, with minimal or no professional contact. They can employ a range of interactive behaviour change techniques (Bennett et al, 2010;Gabriele, Carpenter, Tate, & Fisher, 2011;Rothert et al, 2006;Wieland et al, 2012) and may be used continually over years if they engage users. For example, smartphone apps can provide personal tailoring of information, 24-hour availability to self-monitoring statistics, anonymity, online social support networks and affordability.…”

“…E-health interventions have been found to be effective in facilitating change across a range of health behaviours including weight loss and diabetes self-management (e.g. Gabriele et al, 2011;Munoz et al, 2006;Tang, Abraham, Greaves & Yates, 2014;Wieland et al, 2012).…”

Machine learning techniques in eating behavior e-coaching

“…Such approaches can be web-based [3], SMS based [43], mobile based [5,46], and furthermore can be based on different analytical methodologies [12,13,49]. There is also an increasing focus on techniques that utilize a smartphone in order to provide an e-coach service [9-11, 25, 30, 50].…”