“…When used in the training sphere (hypothesis 1) it drives and motivates creativity in the students, as they can experience the content they are learning in the first person, meaning that the link between theory and experimentation becomes evident (Chen and Tsai, 2012;Wei et al, 2015). If we focus on the main objective of this study, which was none other than determining if AR can be used in the area of inclusive education (Lin and Chao;Fombona et al, 2012), we verified that students enrolled in the Master' s degree in Inclusive Education agree that it can, just as in the works by Chen, Lee and Lin (2016), which reflected on the possibility of using it with autistic children, or the work by McMahon, Cihak, David and Wright (2015), who presented their advances also with autistic children as well as those who had intellectual disability, or the work by Lin and Chang (2015), as well as interculturalism and multiculturalism, visual, motor, psychological, hearing disabilities or those who have high abilities (hypothesis 2 and 3) (Seo et al, 2006;Cozar et al, 2015;Wojciechowski and Cellary, 2013). Nonetheless, just as in the work by Chiang, Yang and Hwang (2014), we found that the variety of devices, as well as images and their quality or lack of, make it so that AR cannot be a tool to be used with those who are visually impaired.…”