2015
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive analysis and assessment of single-cell copy-number variations

Abstract: We present an open-source web platform, Ginkgo (http://qb.cshl.edu/ginkgo), for the analysis and assessment of single-cell copy-number variations (CNVs). Ginkgo automatically constructs copy-number profiles of cells from mapped reads and constructs phylogenetic trees of related cells. We validate Ginkgo by reproducing the results of five major studies and examine the characteristics of three commonly used single-cell amplification techniques to conclude degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR to be the most cons… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
316
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
316
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an additional confirmation of the deletion variant, we subjected a portion of the MDA-amplified single cell genomic DNA that was used for SLAV-seq to shallow whole genome sequencing. Consistent with previous reports 24 , we observed high variability in the normalized read count per 500kb bin across the genome [coefficient of variation (SD/mean) of 0.65, 0.77 and 1.01 for samples 48, 53, and 153, respectively] due to unequal amplification from single cell whole genome amplification. Nevertheless, we observed a reduction in normalized read counts at position chr7:108.7–109.5MB, consistent with the SLAV found in that position in sample 153 (Fig 4A, right).…”
Section: L1 Sequences Are Hotspots For Somatic Cnvs That Are Createdsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As an additional confirmation of the deletion variant, we subjected a portion of the MDA-amplified single cell genomic DNA that was used for SLAV-seq to shallow whole genome sequencing. Consistent with previous reports 24 , we observed high variability in the normalized read count per 500kb bin across the genome [coefficient of variation (SD/mean) of 0.65, 0.77 and 1.01 for samples 48, 53, and 153, respectively] due to unequal amplification from single cell whole genome amplification. Nevertheless, we observed a reduction in normalized read counts at position chr7:108.7–109.5MB, consistent with the SLAV found in that position in sample 153 (Fig 4A, right).…”
Section: L1 Sequences Are Hotspots For Somatic Cnvs That Are Createdsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For each sample, read counts per bin were normalized proportionally to make the total read counts to 1 million, followed by GC content adjustment for each bin. Sample codes for this analysis have been published previously [33,34]. Median values of each bin read counts of WBC controls were used to exclude low coverage bins from downstream analyses (<100 reads).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ratios between test samples and WBC controls were calculated and reported after Log2 transformation. Chromosomal segments were predicted using R Bioconductor package DNAcopy (alpha = 0.05), see the sample code from the literature [33,34] which determined break points where DNA copy number changed. LSTs were calculated as number of chromosomal breaks between adjacent regions of at least 10 Mb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the clean sequence reads are aligned to the human reference genome (hg38) with Burrows-Wheeler aligner MEM (22), ordered and indexed using SAMtools (23). The copy number alteration (CNA) status of a single cell is analyzed using Ginkgo (24). Briefly, the mapped reads are binned by chromosome position, normalized for GC biases and other amplification artifacts, and then segmented to identify chromosome regions with consistent copy number status.…”
Section: Bioinformatic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%