1983
DOI: 10.1021/j100225a032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of ruthenium(II) photosensitizers with Triton X-100

Abstract: Using excited-state lifetime measurements as a probe, we have studied the interactions between a series of ruthenium(II) photosensitizers and Triton X-100 surfactant. The complexes are weakly bound to the surfactant assemblies, and the presence of the photosensitizers influences the assembly process. There is a good correlation between the strength of the binding and the nature of the ligands on the metal complex.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength of binding depends on the combination of electrostatic attractions or repulsions and hydrophobic effects [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Davies et al studied the effects of micellar solution on the electron transfer reaction between [Co(terpyr)] 2+ and a series of Co(III)-complexes in varying ligand structure and ionic charge redox reactions of amphiphilic cobalt complexes [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The strength of binding depends on the combination of electrostatic attractions or repulsions and hydrophobic effects [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Davies et al studied the effects of micellar solution on the electron transfer reaction between [Co(terpyr)] 2+ and a series of Co(III)-complexes in varying ligand structure and ionic charge redox reactions of amphiphilic cobalt complexes [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We have used a model developed by Demas et al [6], which was extensively developed by Snyder et al [10] to interpret our results. This model takes into account the interaction between the chromium complex (A) and both surfactant monomer (S) and micelle (M), described by the following equations: …”
Section: Luminescence Lifetime Vs Tx-100 Concentration Titration Curvesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The study of such systems has been a continuous interest area. In the literature, there are many works that report the interaction of a-diimine-ruthenium(II) ðRuðNNÞ 2þ 3 Þ complexes to different micellar media [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] as well as the influence of these interactions on the reactions with various compounds [12,13]. Moreover, the photochemistry and photophysics of a-diimine-chromium(III) ðCrðNNÞ 3þ 3 Þ complexes have been extensively studied in homogeneous systems [14,18], whereas there are, to the best of our knowledge, only a few works in micellar systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger K S value of 1d than of 1b and 1c would suggest that, apart from the steric hindrance effect, other factors may have a certain role in the solubilization process of this substrate in the nonionic micellar aggregates studied. A possibility might arise from the favorable interactions (30) between the π-bonding aromatic region of the Triton X-100 micelles and the phenyl-substituted substrate, the alkyl derivatives lacking these π interactions.…”
Section: Kinetic Datamentioning
confidence: 98%