1967
DOI: 10.1021/j100870a014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of methyl and difluoromethyl radicals and the elimination of hydrogen fluoride from "hot" 1,1-difluoroethane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BP [14] attempted to employ the standard method of extrapolation to zero ketone concentration for determining A[2,3,6,9,11], but to some extent they misevaluated the more complex two source molecules situation, and could not conclude that reaction (11) occured. BP found that reaction (9) was much faster than reaction (101, e.g., kg = 50 klo at 145"C, so neglecting reaction (10) in the usual kinetic analysis, kll/k12 can be found from the simplified equation, The plot is shown in Figure 1, and the intercept is 0.35.…”
Section: Re-examination Of A(ch3 Cf2h)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BP [14] attempted to employ the standard method of extrapolation to zero ketone concentration for determining A[2,3,6,9,11], but to some extent they misevaluated the more complex two source molecules situation, and could not conclude that reaction (11) occured. BP found that reaction (9) was much faster than reaction (101, e.g., kg = 50 klo at 145"C, so neglecting reaction (10) in the usual kinetic analysis, kll/k12 can be found from the simplified equation, The plot is shown in Figure 1, and the intercept is 0.35.…”
Section: Re-examination Of A(ch3 Cf2h)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly there seems to be little basis for prior discussions [5,[11][12][13] concerning a correlation between the effects of c(-and @-fluorination with variation in E*, particularly in view of the fact that some of this discussion [l l-131 was based on E* = 51 kcalmole-l for C2H6F*. Internal Energv.…”
Section: Tschuikow-roux [34]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous values were k,/k;/' = 2.2 x 103 e-6,900/RT mole-'/' cc sec-1/2 for TFA [2] and k;/ki1/' = 5.1 x lo3 e-8000/RT mole-'/' cc sec-1'2 for DFA [3]. We now consider that our original TFA data are in error due to the presence of an impurity in the TFA sample [7]. In the two TFA systems the experimental values of k,/ki/z tend to agree at the highest temperatures, which would be expected, since the presence of a impurity with a labile hydrogen would be relatively more important at low temperatures.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%