1988
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1988.33.5.1202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of inorganic carbon and light availability as controlling factors in aquatic macrophyte distribution and productivity

Abstract: The roles of inorganic carbon and light availability in the quantitative distribution and photosynthetic productivity of submersed aquatic macrophytes were investigated in two lakes in a stream‐connected hard‐water lake chain where light availability and pH increase and total inorganic carbon decreases as water flows from a turbid productive lake through progressively clearer less productive lakes. Bicarbonate‐using species dominated the macrophyte communities of both lakes, but species requiring free CO2 were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High levels of photosynthesis by either algae or macrophytes within a lake will tend to shift the equilibrium towards a bicarbonate dominated system, at least in daytime when photosynthesis is occurring. N. flexilis is an obligate CO 2 user and cannot utilise bicarbonate (Hough & Fornwall, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High levels of photosynthesis by either algae or macrophytes within a lake will tend to shift the equilibrium towards a bicarbonate dominated system, at least in daytime when photosynthesis is occurring. N. flexilis is an obligate CO 2 user and cannot utilise bicarbonate (Hough & Fornwall, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…flexilis grows in mesotrophic lakes and is an obligate dissolvedcarbon dioxide utiliser (Hough & Fornwall, 1988;Hough & Wetzel, 1978). It has been reported from depths of 0.2 -14.0 m (Pip and Simmons, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Downstream in East Graham Lake the abundance of phytoplankton, periphyton, and non-rooted macrophytes is lower than in Shoe Lake, whereas the productivity and diversity of rooted macrophytes is higher than in Shoe Lake . Experiments (Hough & Fornwall, 1988 ;Hough et al, 1989) indicated that macrophytes in Shoe Lake are primarily light limited, whereas in East Graham Lake non-rooted macrophytes such as Ceratophyllum are nitrogen-limited ; free CO2 availability influences species composition in both lakes . A preliminary survey of phytoplankton species abundance in the two lakes (Table 2 ; data obtained by microscopy of cells and colonies collected by quantitative filtration) revealed the usual inverse relationship between diversity and productivity (see chlorophyll a, Table 1) .…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free CO2 differences between the two lakes (Table 1) were shown to influence some macrophyte species there (Hough & Fornwall, 1988), and some of the phytoplankton species may be similarly sensitive to this .…”
Section: Species Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…flexilis appears to be unsuccessful in sites where eutrophication has occurred due to a lack of available carbon dioxide, which reduces the photosynthetic capacity of the plant. This is because N. flexilis is an obligate carbon dioxide user and cannot utilize bicarbonate (often the predominant form of carbon in eutrophic waters: Hough and Wetzel, 1978;Hough and Fornwall, 1988). In contrast to eutrophication, acidification appears to affect the reproductive capacity of the plant, not the photosynthetic capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%