2019
DOI: 10.1002/sia.6692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of hydrosiloxane and vinylsiloxane groups with aluminum oxide surfaces

Abstract: Silicone‐based materials often contain vinylsiloxane and hydrosiloxane groups for cross‐linking by a radical or addition reaction. Such functional groups can influence the interactions with fillers or with surfaces of substrates when used as adhesives. This work examined how these functional groups interact with aluminum oxide surfaces. For this purpose, aluminum oxide powders with large surface areas of 150 m2/g and different acid‐base properties were examined. Siloxanes were applied as thin layers to mainly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M 1 , M 3 and M 4 were grafted onto PET and ETFE. The differences of the results were likely resulted from the different affinity (wettability) between the monomer and the substrate, the different reactivity of hydrogens in the substrate, and the UV transparency of the films . As far as the reactivity of hydrogens was concerned, the influence from degree of regularity and surface tension of substrate should be considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…M 1 , M 3 and M 4 were grafted onto PET and ETFE. The differences of the results were likely resulted from the different affinity (wettability) between the monomer and the substrate, the different reactivity of hydrogens in the substrate, and the UV transparency of the films . As far as the reactivity of hydrogens was concerned, the influence from degree of regularity and surface tension of substrate should be considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences of the results were likely resulted from the different affinity (wettability) between the monomer and the substrate, the different reactivity of hydrogens in the substrate, and the UV transparency of the films. [64] As far as the reactivity of hydrogens was concerned, the influence from degree of regularity and surface tension of substrate should be considered. For a substrate with high regularity and polarity, it is relatively difficult for the hydrogens to be abstracted, which is not favorable for the subsequent coupling reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%