1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0098-8472(97)00028-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of CO2 enrichment and temperature on cotton growth and leaf characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
50
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Idso et al (1989) also observed similar moderating effect of CO2 enrichment in Azolla sp. On the contrary, Reddy et al (1998) reported that high temperature during the critical stages of plant growth nullified the effect of C02.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Idso et al (1989) also observed similar moderating effect of CO2 enrichment in Azolla sp. On the contrary, Reddy et al (1998) reported that high temperature during the critical stages of plant growth nullified the effect of C02.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Temperature appears positively correlated with SD (Ferris et al, 1996;Reddy et al, 1998;; but see Apple et al, 2000), a likely consequence of enhanced water stress. Temperature may also affect SI (Ferris et al, 1996;, suggesting an in¯uence on stomatal initiation.…”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Temperature may also affect SI (Ferris et al, 1996;, suggesting an in¯uence on stomatal initiation. Reddy et al (1998), however, found no response. The in¯uence of temperature on stomatal initiation may be inconsequential, though, as most plants partially normalize for¯uctuating temperatures by adjusting the timing of leaf development, and so the temperature at which stomata form remains fairly constant .…”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Suggested solutions to these problems were selection of tolerant cultivars, effective and timely insect and weed control, adequate irrigation regime, use of proper crop monitoring techniques and application of plant growth regulators. Reddy et al (1998) found that when Upland cotton Gossypium hirsutum cv. DPL-51 was grown in naturally lit plant growth chambers at 30/22°C day/night temperatures from sowing until floral bud production, and at 20/12, 25/17, 30/22, 35/27 and 40/32°C for 42 d after floral bud production, fruit retention was severely curtailed at the 2 higher temperatures compared with 30/22°C.…”
Section: Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%