1977
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3279-4_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of Acetylcholine Receptors with Organic Mercury Compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the present observation of a decrease in carbachol-stimulated PI hydrolysis at PND 1 is consistent with a decrease in muscarinic receptors in MeHg-exposed rats. Both inorganic mercury and MeHg have been reported to directly inhibit muscarinic receptor binding, and it was suggested that the molecular mechanism of this effect might involve the interaction of mercurials with essential sulfhydryl groups located at the binding site of the muscarinic receptor (Abd-Elfattah and Shamoo, 1981;Eldefrawi et al, 1977). The high affinity of mercury and MeHg for sulfhydryl groups on cysteine residues (Hughes, 1957;Mullaney et al, 1994) and the numerous cysteine residues which are required for biological activity of Trk receptors (Bothwell, 1995;McDonald and Chao, 1995) suggests a common mechanism for the inhibition of muscarinic and Trk receptors, which could lead to a corresponding decrease in receptor signaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the present observation of a decrease in carbachol-stimulated PI hydrolysis at PND 1 is consistent with a decrease in muscarinic receptors in MeHg-exposed rats. Both inorganic mercury and MeHg have been reported to directly inhibit muscarinic receptor binding, and it was suggested that the molecular mechanism of this effect might involve the interaction of mercurials with essential sulfhydryl groups located at the binding site of the muscarinic receptor (Abd-Elfattah and Shamoo, 1981;Eldefrawi et al, 1977). The high affinity of mercury and MeHg for sulfhydryl groups on cysteine residues (Hughes, 1957;Mullaney et al, 1994) and the numerous cysteine residues which are required for biological activity of Trk receptors (Bothwell, 1995;McDonald and Chao, 1995) suggests a common mechanism for the inhibition of muscarinic and Trk receptors, which could lead to a corresponding decrease in receptor signaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eldefrawi et al (1977) reported that 10 M methylmercury inhibited binding of [ 3 H]nicotine to rat brain membranes by 60%. Methylmercury (10 M) was also shown to suppress depolarizing responses to nicotine in N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells (Quandt et al, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of receptors and ion channels have been reported to be directly affected by mercury compounds. Methylmercury blocks the binding of ACh to the Torpedo californica electric organ nAChRs and the binding of nicotine to nAChRs expressed in rat brain (Eldefrawi et al, 1977). Methylmercury also suppresses nicotinic responses in neuroblastoma cells (Quandt et al, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the neuronal cholinergic system was postulated to be an important target for MeHg toxicity (Atchison, 2005). Substantial evidences indicate that the neuronal cholinergic muscarinic system is altered by exposure to low concentrations of MeHg (Basu et al, 2006;Castoldi et al, 1996;Coccini et al, 2000;Eldefrawi et al, 1977;Von Burg et al, 1980). Currently, developmental neurotoxicity is considered to be the most sensitive adverse health effect of MeHg (Risher et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methylmercury (Mehg) Is An Environmental Toxicant That Is Knmentioning
confidence: 95%