2021
DOI: 10.1111/ppa.13455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions in the Brassica napusPyrenopeziza brassicae pathosystem and sources of resistance to P. brassicae (light leaf spot)

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a separate study that assessed resistance against P. brassicae in different B. napus genotypes, selected Q DH lines have shown more resistance compared to that of commercial oilseed rape cultivars. In addition, the resistance in those lines appeared to be less sensitive toward the increasing virulence of P. brassicae isolates (Karandeni Dewage et al, 2021). This agrees with the stability of the resistance in Q DH lines across different P. brassicae populations observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a separate study that assessed resistance against P. brassicae in different B. napus genotypes, selected Q DH lines have shown more resistance compared to that of commercial oilseed rape cultivars. In addition, the resistance in those lines appeared to be less sensitive toward the increasing virulence of P. brassicae isolates (Karandeni Dewage et al, 2021). This agrees with the stability of the resistance in Q DH lines across different P. brassicae populations observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Even though the average LLS resistance rating of oilseed rape cultivars has increased in recent years 1 , frequent recent epidemics of LLS indicate that the currently available cultivar resistance is inadequate to achieve successful control of this disease (CropMonitor, 2016). There has been little knowledge on the genetic basis of host resistance against P. brassicae (Karandeni Dewage et al, 2021) with only three published studies on mapping qualitative or quantitative resistance genes (Pilet et al, 1998;Bradburne et al, 1999;Boys et al, 2012). Moreover, sexual reproduction of P. brassicae could lead to the development of new virulent strains, rendering the resistance genes ineffective (Boys et al, 2007;Karandeni Dewage et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease severity is also impacted by the type of disease resistance of the host, whether it is qualitative or quantitative; in Brassica blackleg disease [62][63][64][65][66][67][68], or in the qualitative type, it depends on the specific pathotype that infects the host. For example, in the B. napus-Pyrenopeziza brassicae (light leaf spot) interaction, the host resistance is specific to the isolated pathotypes [69]. In the blackleg and clubroot pathosystems, the resistance genes of the host exert direct selection pressure on L. maculans and P. brassicae, thus increasing the adaptability of the pathogens and causing higher severity of disease in the host due to resistance breakdown, particularly when cultivars of major R genes are being deployed on large scales in fields [70,71].…”
Section: Complex Host-pathogen Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%