Interactions in predicting mood from extraversion and neuroticism.

McFatter, Robert M.

doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.570

Cited by 67 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent work suggests that extraversion and neuroticism may jointly influence affective responding under certain conditions (e.g., Derryberry & Reed, 1994;McFatter, 1994;Wallace, Newman, & Bachorowski, 1991). We therefore conducted preliminary analyses in which extraversion, neuroficism, and their interaction were entered as predictors of affective reports.…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relations between Affect and Personality: Support for the Affect-Level and Affective-Reactivity Views

Gross

Sutton

Ketelaar

1998

Pers Soc Psychol Bull

373

307

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A consensus has emerged that neuroticism is associated with negative affect and extraversion is associated with positive affect. However; it is unclear whether these personality traits are associated with magnitude of affective reactions (Affective-Reactivity view), with levels of tonic affect (Affect-Level view), or with both. To assess these views, affective state was manipulated using film clips, measured at multiple time points, and `related to measures of neuroticism and extraversion (H. J. Esyenck) and dispositional negative affect and positive affect (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen). Results supported both Affective-Reactivity and Affect-Level views, and this support was more robust for neuroticism and extraversion than for dispositional negative affect and positive affect.

show abstract

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relations between Affect and Personality: Support for the Affect-Level and Affective-Reactivity Views

Gross

Sutton

Ketelaar

1998

Pers Soc Psychol Bull

373

307

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…13 Johnson ve Ostendorf neşeli, enerjik, istekli, arkadaş canlısı gibi sıfatların pozitif olarak, dikkatsizlik, düşüncesizlik gibi özelliklerin de negatif olarak bu faktör içerisinde yer aldıklarını bildirmişler-dir. 14 Hogan, faktörün sosyallik ve girişkenlik olarak ikiye ayrılması gerektiğini, 15 McFatter, dışadönüklüğün dürtüsellik yönünün daha kuvvetli ilişkiler gösterdi-ğini, 16 MacDonald da dışadönüklerin ödüle duyarlı olduklarını belirtmişlerdir.…”

unclassified

Klinik Olmayan Örneklemde Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri Belirti Tarama Amaçlı Kullanılabilir mi?: Ön Çalışma

Tatar

Bildik

Saltukoğlu³

et al. 2014

FSMIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated whether Five Factor Personality Inventory (5FKE) can be used for symptom screening purposes in a non-clinical sample. A total of 165 people 103 women (62.4%) and 62 men (37.6%) between the ages of 18-54 years participated in the study. The internal consistency for factors of 5FKE was found between 0.85 and 0.91, while for sub-scales of Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R) it was between 0.69 and 0.91. Correlation coefficients between three sub-scales of SCL-90-R and the factors of 5FKE were as follows: Global Severity Index correlations with Openness to Experience was -0.17, with Conscientiousness 0.28, with Agreeableness -0.35, and with Emotional Instability it was 0.65; Positive Symptom Total correlations with Openness to Experience was -0.10, with Conscientiousness -0.20, with Agreeableness -0.23, and with Emotional Instability it was 0.57; Positive Symptom Distress Index correlations with Openness to Experience was -0.14, with Conscientiousness -0.28, with Agreeableness -0.33, and with Emotional Instability it was 0.51. Extraversion factor of 5FKE showed insignificant and weak correlations with all three sub-scales of SCL-90-R. Regression analysis calculated to infer total scores of three sub-scales of SCL-90-R showed that only the factor score of Emotional Instability inferred the total score of Global Symptom Index of SCL-90-R significantly. The results of this study gave clues that the 5FKE particularly "Emotional Instability" factor could be used for screening purposes in a non-clinical sample. However, the results also revealed that the issue should be investigated in more detail.

show abstract

“…Whereas some research has found evidence for an interaction between Extraversion and Neuroticism in predicting positive and negative affect (McFatter, 1994), other research has not supported this finding (Allik & Realo, 1997;Rusting & Larsen, 1997).…”

Section: Positive and Negative Affectmentioning

confidence: 61%

“…(Allik & Realo, 1997;Berry & Hansen, 1996;McFatter, 1994;Meyer & Shack, 1989) and fundamental to theoretical formulations of the structure of affect (Costa & McCrae, 1992;Watson et al, 1988). One of the lines of evidence for the conceptualization of positive and negative affect as independent dimensions is that positive affect is related to Extraversion but negative affect is not (Allik & Realo, 1997;Diener & Emmons, 1985;; it is expected that this finding will be replicated.…”

Section: Hypothesismentioning

confidence: 85%

“…Positive affect is closely related to Extraversion, (see Costa & McCrae, 1992;Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) a connection that has been shown to generalize across language and culture (Allik & Realo, 1997). Factor analytic research has consistently found positive affect and Extraversion to load on a single factor (Berry & Hansen, 1996;McFatter, 1994;Meyer & Shack, 1989). However, others have shown that positive affect is predicted equally well by the Big Five dimensions of Extraversion or Agreeableness, suggesting that while positive affect stems primarily from interactions with others, both quantity and quality of relationships are important in that connection (DeNeve & Cooper, 1998).…”

Section: Positive and Negative Affectmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Personality, other dispositional variables, and human adaptability

Lindley

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMl films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer.The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMl a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMl directly to order. The relationships among several variables that have been demonstrated to relate to one another and to positive human functioning were examined. The variables included in the study are Extraversion, Neuroticism, positive and negative affect, self-efficacy, self-esteem, optimism, locus of control, and emotional intelligence. The primary goals of the study were to determine whether an underlying element of adaptability could explain the previously reported overlap among these constructs, to examine the predictive ability of these constructs with regard to academic success, and to engage in exploratory investigation of the construct of emotional intelligence. Participants were 316 undergraduate students (211 female, 105 male). A factor analysis was conducted using all the variables, including several that were included for purposes of disconfirmation. The variables predicted to be related to adaptability (listed above) loaded on the first two factors, labeled Reflective Adaptability and Agentic Adaptability. Other variables not expected to be related to adaptability loaded on the remaining three factors. In addition, six detailed hypotheses were formulated based on previous findings and theoretical principles. Most hypotheses were supported, and most expected relationships were found. In general, the conceptualization of an underlying element of adaptability was supported, because of the factor analytic results and because variables expected to be included in this construct were found to have much stronger relationships with one another than they did with variables that were not expected to be included in the construct of adaptability (e.g., Holland theme self-efficacy). Nevertheless, 2 there was also support for the conceptualization of variables included in the study as distinct constructs that are independen...

show abstract

Interactions in predicting mood from extraversion and neuroticism.

Cited by 67 publications

References 33 publications

Relations between Affect and Personality: Support for the Affect-Level and Affective-Reactivity Views

Relations between Affect and Personality: Support for the Affect-Level and Affective-Reactivity Views

Klinik Olmayan Örneklemde Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri Belirti Tarama Amaçlı Kullanılabilir mi?: Ön Çalışma

Personality, other dispositional variables, and human adaptability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About