2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0307l.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex

Abstract: 1. Intracortical inhibition in the human motor cortex has been previously demonstrated using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols at short intervals (1-6 ms; short interval intracortical inhibition, SICI) with a subthreshold conditioning pulse preceding a suprathreshold test pulse, and at long intervals (50-200 ms; long interval intracortical inhibition, LICI) with suprathreshold conditioning and test pulses.2. We investigated whether different circuits mediate these inhibitory phenom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

50
392
4
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 469 publications
(455 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
50
392
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Reduced cortical inhibition during ppTMS in autism strongly suggests dysfunction of GABAergic circuits (specifically, impaired activity at GABA A receptors 17 ) and supports the hypothesis that this disorder is associated with reduced control of the basal ganglia ⁄ frontostriatal motor loop. 20 This is consistent with DSM-IV-TR accounts of motor dysfunction in autism (including stereotyped body movements, which seem to imply a deficit in inhibitory control), and empirical studies of the control of motor activity (including gait variability 6 ) and motor-related brain activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 Reduced cortical inhibition during ppTMS in autism strongly suggests dysfunction of GABAergic circuits (specifically, impaired activity at GABA A receptors 17 ) and supports the hypothesis that this disorder is associated with reduced control of the basal ganglia ⁄ frontostriatal motor loop. 20 This is consistent with DSM-IV-TR accounts of motor dysfunction in autism (including stereotyped body movements, which seem to imply a deficit in inhibitory control), and empirical studies of the control of motor activity (including gait variability 6 ) and motor-related brain activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…reduced MEP amplitude), reflecting GABA A function. 17 By contrast, a 15ms interval results in a facilitatory effect (i.e. enhanced MEP amplitude), reflecting glutamatergic function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 2 mV intensity was determined separately for postural, shortening and lengthening contractions. This was performed because preliminary experiments at a constant test TMS intensity produced large variations (range from 1 mV in the postural task to 8 mV during shortening) in test MEP amplitude during the different contraction phases, and these large differences in MEP amplitude would confound the comparison of SICI and LICI between tasks [34,35]. Measurements of SICI used a 2 ms interstimulus interval (ISI), whereas measurements of LICI used a 150 ms ISI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since SICI as well as CSP reflect the activity of GABAergic inhibitory circuits Sanger, Garg, & Chen, 2001;Werhahn, Kunesch, Noachtar, Benecke, & Classen, 1999;Ziemann, Lonnecker, Steinhoff, & Paulus, 1996), the increase of CSP duration and SICI might be the expression of an enhanced excitability of the inhibitory GABA-controlled interneuronal circuits in the motor cortex due to a lack of inhibitory control usually exerted by the thalamocortical projections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%