Interactions Between the Brain and the Immune System

Abstract

The observations and research described in this communication derive from a nontraditional view of the immune system. It has become abundantly clear that there are probably no organ systems or homeostatic defense mechanisms that are not, in vivo, subject to the influence of interactions between behavioral and physiological events. The complex mechanisms underlying these interactions and their relationship to health and illness, however, are imperfectly understood. The most imperfectly understood, perhaps, are the interrelationships among brain, behavior, and immune processes. Without attempting to cover all the literature, we have used stress effects and conditioning phenomena as illustrations to point out that behavior can influence immune function. We have also described data indicating that the immune system can receive and respond to neural and endocrine signals. Conversely, behavioral, neural, and endocrine responses seem to be influenced by an activated immune system. Thus, a traditional view of immune function that is confined to cellular interactions occurring within lymphoid tissues is insufficient to account for changes in immunity observed in subhuman animals and man under real world conditions. These data question seriously the notion of an autonomous immune system. Most of the research on the regulation of immune responses has been predicated on the assumption that such regulation is accomplished by the interacting components of the immune system itself, e.g. interactions among helper and suppressor T-lymphocytes, B-cells, and accessory cells that can result in the production of antibody and effector T cells. The immune system is, indeed, capable of considerable self-regulation, and immune responses can be made to take place in vitro. The functions of that component of adaptive processes known as the immune system that are of ultimate concern, however, are those that take place in vivo. There are now compelling reasons to believe that in vivo immunoregularity processes influence and are influenced by the neuroendocrine environment in which such processes actually take place--an environment that, on the one hand, can generate signals that resting and/or activated leukocytes can receive, and, on the other hand, is exquisitely sensitive to the individual's perception of and capacity to adapt to the demands of the environment. The immune system appears to be modulated, not only by feedback mechanisms mediated through neural and endocrine processes, but by feedforward mechanisms as well. The immunologic effects of learning, an essential feedforward mechanism, suggest that, like direct neural and endocrine processes, behavior can, under appropriate circumstances, serve an immunoregulatory function in vivo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Stimulation of the B Cell Receptor, CD86 (B7-2), and the β2-Adrenergic Receptor Intrinsically Modulates the Level of IgG1 and IgE Produced per B Cell

“…For example, norepinephrine stimulation of the ␤ 2 AR on a B cell is required for Ag-specific B cells to produce "normal" serum levels of Th2 cell-dependent Ab (20). However, we also know that when norepinephrine is removed in vivo, the ability of B cells to produce Ab is never ablated completely (20,50), and when norepinephrine is added in vitro, the higher amount of Ab induced is rarely increased more than 3-fold. Thus, the immune system appears to regulate intrinsically the level of Ab produced by a B cell, but this level of regulation can be further modulated by mechanisms normally associated with nervous system regulation of organ function, such as norepinephrine stimulation of the ␤ 2 AR.…”

Sympathetic nervous system control of anti-influenza CD8+T cell responses

“…It is well-established that the nervous and immune systems communicate through soluble mediators, such as cytokines, hormones, and neurotransmitters (1,2). Indeed, the definition of molecules as ''immune'' vs. ''neuronal'' mediators is frequently an arbitrarily designation based on the chronology of discovery.…”

Shift work and Risks in Pregnant Women

“…To survive and remain healthy, the human body has to keep a balance between different processes within the organism (Ader et al 1990;Anisman et al, 1996;and Mason, 1959). This regulation involves many systems that interact on various levels (Ader et al, 1995; Besedovsky and del Rey, 1999) and have evolved intricate processes to keep the different systems within certain boundaries.…”