2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between soil biota and the effects on geomorphological features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is considerable controversy regarding the role that biota may play in the formation of these mounds and the mechanistic pathways by which the mounds take form. For example, different investigators have variably attributed Mima mounds in North America to earth‐moving activities of fossorial mammals (Cox and Allen, ; Howath and Johnson, ), spatially variable vegetation and associated differences in either sediment deposition or soil erosion (Barnes, ; Siefert et al ., ), as well as non‐biotic factors (briefly listed in Siefert et al ., ; Zaitlin and Hayashi, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is considerable controversy regarding the role that biota may play in the formation of these mounds and the mechanistic pathways by which the mounds take form. For example, different investigators have variably attributed Mima mounds in North America to earth‐moving activities of fossorial mammals (Cox and Allen, ; Howath and Johnson, ), spatially variable vegetation and associated differences in either sediment deposition or soil erosion (Barnes, ; Siefert et al ., ), as well as non‐biotic factors (briefly listed in Siefert et al ., ; Zaitlin and Hayashi, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zaitlin et al [ 24 ] could also not confirm clear effects of burrowing activity on infiltration rates in a haplic chernozem within the prairie pothole region in Canada. Zaitlin and Hayashi [ 60 ] conclude that burrowing mammals generally increase the patchiness of an environment. Overall, this suggests that the soil memory for physical bioturbation effects is spatially and temporally too diverse as to expect statistically significant results from a number of point samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large proportion of research on zoogeomorphology and biopedoturbation has centred on understanding the geomorphic and biogeochemical work of burrowing and soil foraging animals (Whitesides and Butler, ; Coombes, ; Coggan et al ., , for reviews). Although these animals conduct their activities at the geomorphological micro‐scale, the cumulative effect of colonies or populations can create distinctive landscapes (Zaitlin and Hayashi, ; Coombes and Viles, ). The micro‐landforms produced by burrowing and soil foraging activities have a patchy distribution that creates gradients of local environmental change (Zaitlin and Hayashi, ), can affect the flow paths of moisture and other resources (Eldridge et al ., ), and can create refugia for plant germination (Whitesides and Butler, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these animals conduct their activities at the geomorphological micro-scale, the cumulative effect of colonies or populations can create distinctive landscapes (Zaitlin and Hayashi, 2012;Coombes and Viles, 2015). The micro-landforms produced by burrowing and soil foraging activities have a patchy distribution that creates gradients of local environmental change (Zaitlin and Hayashi, 2012), can affect the flow paths of moisture and other resources (Eldridge et al, 2010), and can create refugia for plant germination (Whitesides and Butler, 2016). Through burial of vegetation by burrow spoil or casting material (Zaitlin and Hayashi, 2012), provision of foraging pits that provide conditions favouring enhanced litter decomposition (Travers and Eldridge, 2016), or selective transport and concentration of organic materials, burrowing and soil foraging animals can profoundly influence the structure and biogeochemistry of soil environments (Coggan et al, 2018), and thereby increase landscape-scale heterogeneity and biodiversity (Zaitlin and Hayashi, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%