2013
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between serotypes of dengue highlight epidemiological impact of cross-immunity

Abstract: Dengue, a mosquito-borne virus of humans, infects over 50 million people annually. Infection with any of the four dengue serotypes induces protective immunity to that serotype, but does not confer long-term protection against infection by other serotypes. The immunological interactions between serotypes are of central importance in understanding epidemiological dynamics and anticipating the impact of dengue vaccines. We analysed a 38-year time series with 12 197 serotyped dengue infections from a hospital in B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
274
1
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
13
274
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of serotype information, for example, we chose not to include immunological covariates in our model. As Pakistan moves toward an endemic transmission setting in the northeast of the country, however, serotype data will be increasingly important to determine how strain dynamics are likely to affect the likelihood of outbreaks (28). Indeed, we believe that the substantial lag time in Lahore we observed was probably due to the recent large outbreak in 2011, which may have generated substantial immunity and delayed the 2013 epidemic (16,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In the absence of serotype information, for example, we chose not to include immunological covariates in our model. As Pakistan moves toward an endemic transmission setting in the northeast of the country, however, serotype data will be increasingly important to determine how strain dynamics are likely to affect the likelihood of outbreaks (28). Indeed, we believe that the substantial lag time in Lahore we observed was probably due to the recent large outbreak in 2011, which may have generated substantial immunity and delayed the 2013 epidemic (16,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Consequently, the relative risk of clinical dengue 4-6 months later is reduced because of a reduced susceptible population, despite conditions propitious for dengue transmission. This may occur irrespective of the circulating serotype as homotypic immunity is believed to be life-long (Sabin, 1952) and heterotypic immunity is estimated to last from 3 months to a year (Reich et al, 2013;Sabin, 1952). The latter may not prevent infection, but rather reduce clinical disease (Endy et al, 2011;Grange et al, 2014;Sabin, 1952).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, ambiguities still exist relating to the various factors affecting dengue virus transmission and immunity, which mostly revolve around the short and long-term effects of a primary dengue virus infection on the immuno-epidemiology and pathology of subsequent infections. For example, it is commonly assumed that following an infection the host remains fully protected against reinfection by all other serotypes for a certain length of time (between 6 months and 2 years) [22][23][24] and that due to the phenomenon of antibody-dependent enhancement, severe infection outcomes are not only much more likely during secondary, heterologous infections but also much more transmissible. This view has recently been challenged, however [25]; and with the majority of dengue infections going unreported and much of the available epidemiological data based on clinical cases only, robust empirical evidence that conclusively relate age, prior exposure, infection pathology and viral transmission is still lacking.…”
Section: Model and Other Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%