2011
DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2010-08p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between Pain and the Motor Cortex: Insights from Research on Phantom Limb Pain and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Abstract: Purpose: Pain is a significantly disabling problem that often interacts with other deficits during the rehabilitation process. The aim of this paper is to review evidence of interactions between pain and the motor cortex in order to attempt to answer the following questions: (1) Does acute pain interfere with motorcortex activity? (2) Does chronic pain interfere with motor-cortex activity, and, conversely, does motor-cortex plasticity contribute to chronic pain? (3) Can the induction of motor plasticity by mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Change in corticospinal excitability could be attributable to several causes. For example, patients with MSK disorders experienced pain for a prolonged period, and pain has been shown to exert an inhibitory effect over M1 (for reviews see (Farina et al, 2003;Mercier and Léonard, 2011;Bank et al, 2013)). It has recently been shown that even low pain levels are sufficient to induce such inhibition, and that the perceived pain level is not associated with the level of inhibition (Dubé and Mercier, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change in corticospinal excitability could be attributable to several causes. For example, patients with MSK disorders experienced pain for a prolonged period, and pain has been shown to exert an inhibitory effect over M1 (for reviews see (Farina et al, 2003;Mercier and Léonard, 2011;Bank et al, 2013)). It has recently been shown that even low pain levels are sufficient to induce such inhibition, and that the perceived pain level is not associated with the level of inhibition (Dubé and Mercier, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a recent work has shown that a single session of anodal tDCS of the motor cortex results in an instant reduction of mu opioid receptor binding of an exogenous receptor ligand in the pain matrix (i.e., nucleus accumbens, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, thalamus), suggesting that the analgesic effect of M1-tDCS may possibly be due to a direct increase of endogenous opioid release [11]. The long-term analgesic effects of motor cortex stimulation could also follow, at least partially, the restoration of defective intracortical inhibitory processes, shown to be impaired following amputation [35].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) studies in upper-and lower-limb amputees show that motor threshold and intracortical inhibition decreases for the muscle proximal to the amputation, suggesting an increased excitability of the corticospinal neurons and a reduction of GABA activity at the cortical level [7,9,10,30,47]. Although the relationship between motor excitability and PLP remains unclear [30,35], these cortical excitability shifts were shown to be larger in patients with PLP than in pain-free patients [13,24,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been demonstrated that pain can lead to a reduction of maximal voluntary contraction, a decrease in endurance and changes in coordination during dynamic motor tasks (see [8][11] for reviews), although the cause of these alterations in motor function are still not fully understood. Several studies have also investigated the influence of pain on corticospinal excitability by looking at motor responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over M1 [11][13]. Most of these studies reported that different types of acute experimental pain applied within or close to the target muscle exert an inhibitory influence on corticospinal excitability [14]–[26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%