Interactions between lexical access and articulation

Fink, Angela; Oppenheim, Gary M.; Goldrick, Matthew

doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1348529

Cited by 27 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 69 publications

(93 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(However, Damian (2003) was unable to replicate this result.) Fink, Oppenheim, and Goldrick (2018) had speakers name series of pictures in shared categories. Semantic interference effects led to prolonged utterance durations.…”

Section: Must Speakers Wait For a Complete Syllable Plan?mentioning

confidence: 99%

On the timing and coordination of articulatory movements: Historical perspectives and current theoretical challenges

Krause

Kawamoto

2020

Language and Linguist. Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Must Speakers Wait For a Complete Syllable Plan?mentioning

confidence: 99%

On the timing and coordination of articulatory movements: Historical perspectives and current theoretical challenges

Krause

Kawamoto

2020

Language and Linguist. Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On a related point, although laboratory studies of blocked cyclic naming often focus on how the semantic context effect increases with repetition (e.g. Oppenheim et al, 2010;Schnur et al, 2006;Fink, Oppenheim, & Goldrick, 2018), we did not consider repetition in this analysis.…”

Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“Did I Say Cherry ?” Error Patterns on a Blocked Cyclic Naming Task for Bilingual Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder

McMillen

Griffin

Peña

et al. 2020

J Speech Lang Hear Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Using a blocked cyclic picture-naming task, we compared accuracy and error patterns across languages for Spanish–English bilingual children with and without developmental language disorder (DLD). Method Pictured stimuli were manipulated for semantic similarity across two (Same and Mixed) category contexts. Children's productions were scored off-line for accuracy, error frequency, and error type. Results Typically developing children were more accurate and produced fewer errors than their peers with DLD; however, this was moderated by task language and semantic context. Children were generally more accurate when naming pictures in English compared to Spanish and in the Mixed-category context compared to the Same-category context. Analyses of error types further showed that children with less English language exposure specifically produced more nonresponses in English than in Spanish. Children with DLD produced more of each error type than their typically developing peers, particularly in Spanish. Conclusions Regardless of language ability, bilingual children demonstrated greater difficulty with lexical retrieval for pictured items in the semantically related context than in the unrelated context. However, bilingual children with DLD produced more errors of all types than is typical for children developing more than one language. Their greater error rates are not secondary to limited second language exposure but instead reflect deficits inherent to the nature of language impairment. Results from this study are discussed using a framework of semantic constraint, where we propose that because bilingual children with DLD have impoverished semantic networks, and this knowledge insufficiently constrains activation for lexical selection, thereby increasing error production.

show abstract

“…Alternatively, it is possible that the dynamics of the planning system after the onset of articulation also influence ongoing articulation. Fink, Oppenheim, and Goldrick (2018) set out to test the assumption of a ballistic execution component, measuring response latency and word duration in sequential picture naming tasks designed to introduce semantic interference. If the production system is ballistic, effects of semantic interference on response latency (an index of planning) and word duration (an index of articulation) should be positively correlated since variation in both metrics arises from the same process.…”

Section: Computational Model (Strand 1)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Control of speaking rate is achieved by switching between qualitatively distinct cognitive “gaits”: Evidence from simulation.

Rodd

Bosker

Ernestus³

et al. 2020

Psychological Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

That speakers can vary their speaking rate is evident, but how they accomplish this has hardly been studied. Consider this analogy: When walking, speed can be continuously increased, within limits, but to speed up further, humans must run. Are there multiple qualitatively distinct speech "gaits" that resemble walking and running? Or is control achieved by continuous modulation of a single gait? This study investigates these possibilities through simulations of a new connectionist computational model of the cognitive process of speech production, EPONA, that borrows from Dell, Burger, and Svec's (1997) model. The model has parameters that can be adjusted to fit the temporal characteristics of speech at different speaking rates. We trained the model on a corpus of disyllabic Dutch words produced at different speaking rates. During training, different clusters of parameter values (regimes) were identified for different speaking rates. In a 1-gait system, the regimes used to achieve fast and slow speech are qualitatively similar, but quantitatively different. In a multiple gait system, there is no linear relationship between the parameter settings associated with each gait, resulting in an abrupt shift in parameter values to move from speaking slowly to speaking fast. After training, the model achieved good fits in all three speaking rates. The parameter settings associated with each speaking rate were not linearly related, suggesting the presence of cognitive gaits. Thus, we provide the first computationally explicit account of the ability to modulate the speech production system to achieve different speaking styles.Speaking is a uniquely human behavior. It is by nature temporal: concepts and ideas are encoded as a stream of rapidly fluctuating sound, and the correct ordering and duration of the components is of crucial importance for intelligibility and conveying meaning. At the same time, there is great variability in the timing of speech sounds: different speakers have different habitual speech rates, and

show abstract

Interactions between lexical access and articulation

Cited by 27 publications

References 69 publications

On the timing and coordination of articulatory movements: Historical perspectives and current theoretical challenges

On the timing and coordination of articulatory movements: Historical perspectives and current theoretical challenges

“Did I Say Cherry ?” Error Patterns on a Blocked Cyclic Naming Task for Bilingual Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder

Control of speaking rate is achieved by switching between qualitatively distinct cognitive “gaits”: Evidence from simulation.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About