1996
DOI: 10.2527/1996.743678x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Prevotella ruminicola, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the digestion of cellulose from forages.

Abstract: The synergistic and inhibitory interactions observed between Fibrobacter succinogenes A3c, Prevotella ruminicola H2b, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens B34b in the digestion of forage cellulose were studied in detail. Orchardgrass and alfalfa hays, both at two maturity stages, were used as substrates. Sequential inoculation procedures were developed whereby a second inoculation was made after the initial fermentation was killed. Total cellulose digestion from sequential addition of the organisms was then compared … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While cellulolytic species may compete directly for cellulose (104,192,193,499,616), both cellulolytic and noncellulolytic species can compete for cellodextrin products of cellulose hydrolysis, in cross-feeding of nutrients, and in production of inhibitory compounds. A number of examples of such interactions have been demonstrated in defined mixed cultures (Table 2).…”
Section: Ecological Aspects Of Cellulose-degrading Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While cellulolytic species may compete directly for cellulose (104,192,193,499,616), both cellulolytic and noncellulolytic species can compete for cellodextrin products of cellulose hydrolysis, in cross-feeding of nutrients, and in production of inhibitory compounds. A number of examples of such interactions have been demonstrated in defined mixed cultures (Table 2).…”
Section: Ecological Aspects Of Cellulose-degrading Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have also described interactions between two or among three cellulolytic species of ruminal bacteria (Odenyo et al, 1994a, b ;Fondevila & Dehority, 1996 ;Mosoni et al, 1997 ;. Most of these studies have been performed under batch culture conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their data indicated that R. albus 8 generally out-competed R. flavefaciens FD-1, due to production by the former of a bacteriocin-like substance. Fondevila & Dehority (1996) presented evidence that cellulose digestion was reduced when strains of F. succinogenes A3c and R. flavefaciens B34b were grown together in batch culture and suggested that an inhibitor was produced by one of the two species. Mosoni et al (1997) reported that R. flavefaciens FD-1 became detached from cellulose in the presence of R. albus 20.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellulose is digested in the rumen (Michalet-Doreau et al 2002). The ability to degrade cellulose depends mainly on the type of forage, crop maturity, and the members of the cellulolytic bacterial communities (Fondevila and Dehority 1996). To ensure maintenance and growth of cellulolytic bacteria, optimal ruminal conditions are required.…”
Section: Cellulose-degrading Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%