1994
DOI: 10.1139/z94-284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between body size and mating history influence the reproductive success of males of a tortricid moth, Zeiraphera canadensis

Abstract: CARROLL, A.L. 1994. Interactions between body size and mating history influence the reproductive success of males of a tortricid moth, Zeiraphera canadensis. Can. J. Zool . 72: 2 124 -2 132. The independent and interacting effects of male body size, age, and previous number of matings on (i) spermatophore size and (ii) female reproductive performance were examined in the laboratory using Zeiraphera canadensis Mut. & Free. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Spermatophore size was not influenced by male age, but large … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects of artificial lighting on male moth life history did not result from variation in relative growth rates, as these were unaffected by artificial night lighting. Although a shorter development time (i.e., early pupation) may reduce the risk of death before reproduction (Benrey and Denno 1997;Nylin and Gotthard 1998), the concomitant reduction in mass may have negative consequences for males, such as decreased longevity, flight ability and sperm competition (Shirai 1993(Shirai , 1995Carroll 1994;Tammaru et al 1996;Iyengar and Eisner 1999), factors that may affect a males' fitness. In females, body mass is strongly correlated to egg production (Hon ek 1993) and thus directly linked to fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects of artificial lighting on male moth life history did not result from variation in relative growth rates, as these were unaffected by artificial night lighting. Although a shorter development time (i.e., early pupation) may reduce the risk of death before reproduction (Benrey and Denno 1997;Nylin and Gotthard 1998), the concomitant reduction in mass may have negative consequences for males, such as decreased longevity, flight ability and sperm competition (Shirai 1993(Shirai , 1995Carroll 1994;Tammaru et al 1996;Iyengar and Eisner 1999), factors that may affect a males' fitness. In females, body mass is strongly correlated to egg production (Hon ek 1993) and thus directly linked to fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, female likelihood of re-mating was higher in C. fumiferana for females mated to males with a poor quality diet but fed the same plant species (Delisle and Hardy 1997), although female fecundity and survival were unaffected by male dietary treatment for those females that did not re-mate. In contrast, male body size (presumably affected by both genetics and environment) and previous number of matings had no effect on female fecundity or survival in Zeiraphera canadensis (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) (Carroll 1994).…”
Section: Adult Life History Traitsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our understanding is more or less limited to the observation that a reduction in larval food quality or quantity generally results in reduced adult body size and fat content with consequent negative effects on fecundity (e.g., Scriber and Slansky 1981;Fischer and Fiedler 2001;Ernsting et al 1992;Awmack and Leather 2002), or on male reproductive success (e.g., Carroll 1994;Delisle and Hardy 1997). While extremely useful, this information does not yet provide insight into the organization of allocation as a whole within any one holometabolous organism, or the integrated suites of adult life history and morphological traits that result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, any mating mistake by a Chrysochus male should reduce his opportunities to mate with conspecific females. What remains unclear is whether males may suffer further reductions in their success in siring conspecific progeny (the only progeny that will enhance their fitness) as a result of energy spent courting, copulating, and guarding females (e.g., Martin and Hosken 2004), or as a result of reduced sperm availability for those matings (e.g., Carroll 1994;Simmons 2001;Lewis 2004). Regardless, the lost mating opportunities resulting from time spent with heterospecific mates would suggest that the frequency with which males mate with heterospecific females should be positively correlated with the strength of selection against hybridization experienced by those males.…”
Section: The Chrysochus Hybrid Zonementioning
confidence: 99%