2005
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225x-34.3.627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions Among Western Corn Rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Yellow Foxtail, and Corn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not quantify the effects of treatment on the roots themselves, but crop root abundance, size and nutritional quality are often affected by cover crops (Hulugalle 1988, Sainju et al 2001) and these host characteristics are extremely important for the successful development of D. virgifera larvae (Moeser and Vidal 2004b, Olmer and Hibbard 2008, Agosti et al 2009). The symptoms that we observed in the larvae of the cover-cropped treatment also have been reported for this species raised on hosts of sub-optimal quality Ortman 1967a, b, 1970;Johnson et al 1984;Clark and Hibbard 2004;Moeser and Vidal 2004a; Wilson and Hibbard 2004;Chege et al 2005;Ellsbury et al 2005;Oyediran et al 2005), which adds further support for our hypothesis that maize plants in the cover-cropped treatment were a less suitable host for developing D. virgifera larvae. In addition, intraspeciÞc competition among the larvae may be affected by the environment produced by the cover crop residue, and merits further examination as a possible mechanism for our observations on larval population characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We did not quantify the effects of treatment on the roots themselves, but crop root abundance, size and nutritional quality are often affected by cover crops (Hulugalle 1988, Sainju et al 2001) and these host characteristics are extremely important for the successful development of D. virgifera larvae (Moeser and Vidal 2004b, Olmer and Hibbard 2008, Agosti et al 2009). The symptoms that we observed in the larvae of the cover-cropped treatment also have been reported for this species raised on hosts of sub-optimal quality Ortman 1967a, b, 1970;Johnson et al 1984;Clark and Hibbard 2004;Moeser and Vidal 2004a; Wilson and Hibbard 2004;Chege et al 2005;Ellsbury et al 2005;Oyediran et al 2005), which adds further support for our hypothesis that maize plants in the cover-cropped treatment were a less suitable host for developing D. virgifera larvae. In addition, intraspeciÞc competition among the larvae may be affected by the environment produced by the cover crop residue, and merits further examination as a possible mechanism for our observations on larval population characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The young adults were assumed to no longer be teneral, as they were fully coloured and did not have the light grey soft body typical of adults just after emergence. The body size parameters included: head capsule width including eyes (Branson and Ortman, 1970; Branson and Sutter, 1985; Oyediran et al, 2004; Ellsbury et al, 2005), pronotum width and length, elytra width (i.e. single measurement of both elytra together across the dorsum), elytra length (Mabry et al, 2004), as well as hind tibia length (Haye et al, 2005; Jenner and Kuhlmann, 2006) (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Setaria spp.) that can serve as alternate WCR larval hosts in maize fields can also delay adult emergence (Breitenbach et al , 2005; Ellsbury et al , 2005) and reduce mean beetle size (Ellsbury et al , 2005) when compared with weed‐free maize. This is consistent with published data that indicate Setaria species are sub‐optimal larval hosts (Branson & Ortman, 1967, 1970; Clark & Hibbard, 2004).…”
Section: Larval and Adult Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%